The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering
Abstract
Context: Making best use of the growing number of empirical studies in Software Engineering, for making decisions and formulating research questions, requires the ability to construct an objective summary of available research evidence. Adopting a systematic approach to assessing and aggregating the outcomes from a set of empirical studies is also particularly important in Software Engineering, given that such studies may employ very different experimental forms and be undertaken in very different experimental contexts.Objectives: To provide an introduction to the role, form and processes involved in performing Systematic Literature Reviews. After the tutorial, participants should be able to read and use such reviews, and have gained the knowledge needed to conduct systematic reviews of their own.Method: We will use a blend of information presentation (including some experiences of the problems that can arise in the Software Engineering domain), and also of interactive working, using review material prepared in advance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2004) · doi:10.5555/998675.999432 · Cited by 656
Analyzing the past to prepare for the future
(2002) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.5555/2017160.2017162 · Cited by 179
Cited by
Blockchain technology in healthcare: a systematic review
Agbo, C. C., Mahmoud, Q. H., & Eklund, J. M. (2019) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare7020056 · Cited by 1,131
Deepfake Detection: A Systematic Literature Review
Rana, M. S., Nobi, M. N., Murali, B., & Sung, A. H. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3154404 · Cited by 573
Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmented reality in educational settings
Garzón, J., Pavón, J., & Baldiris, S. (2019) · Virtual Reality · doi:10.1007/s10055-019-00379-9 · Cited by 562
A Survey of DevOps Concepts and Challenges
Leite, L., Rocha, C., Kon, F., Milojicic, D., & Meirelles, P. (2020) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3359981 · Cited by 484
Badgujar, C. M., Poulose, A., & Gan, H. (2024) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2024.109090 · Cited by 411
Metadata
- Authors
- Budgen, D., & Brereton, P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2006-05-28
- Pages
- 1051-1052
- ISSN
- 0270-5257 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032860265
- Cited by
- 636
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1134285.1134500
- The paper
- Budgen, D., & Brereton, P. (2006). Performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering. https://doi.org/10.1145/1134285.1134500
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
