Cited by 476Smart Agriculture and AIAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsRemote Sensing in Agriculture

Agricultural object detection with You Only Look Once (YOLO) Algorithm: A bibliometric and systematic literature review

Badgujar, Chetan M, Poulose, Alwin, Gan, Hao·2024·Computers and Electronics in Agriculture

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compag.2024.109090

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Badgujar, C. M., Poulose, A., & Gan, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
  • Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Thiruvananthapuram (IN)
Corresponding author
Badgujar, Chetan M
Venue
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-08
Volume
223
Pages
109090
ISSN
0168-1699 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399235601
Cited by
411
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 167 · 2025: 203 · 2024: 41
FWCI
15.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Keywords
YOLO, object detection, computer vision for agriculture, digital agriculture, one-stage object detection, real-time detection, agricultural monitoring, agricultural robotics, research trends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review