The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Topic modeling: beyond bag-of-words
Abstract
Some models of textual corpora employ text generation methods involving n-gram statistics, while others use latent topic variables inferred using the "bag-of-words" assumption, in which word order is ignored. Previously, these methods have not been combined. In this work, I explore a hierarchical generative probabilistic model that incorporates both n-gram statistics and latent topic variables by extending a unigram topic model to include properties of a hierarchical Dirichlet bigram language model. The model hyperparameters are inferred using a Gibbs EM algorithm. On two data sets, each of 150 documents, the new model exhibits better predictive accuracy than either a hierarchical Dirichlet bigram language model or a unigram topic model. Additionally, the inferred topics are less dominated by function words than are topics discovered using unigram statistics, potentially making them more meaningful.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Griffiths, T. L., & Steyvers, M. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0307752101 · Cited by 6,049
An introduction to MCMC for machine learning.
Andrieu, C., de Freitas, N., Doucet, A., & Jordan, M. I. (2003) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1020281327116 · Cited by 2,451
Cited by
Blei, D. M. (2012) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/2133806.2133826 · Cited by 5,516
Artificial intelligence in marketing: Topic modeling, scientometric analysis, and research agenda
Mustak, M., Salminen, J., Plé, L., & Wirtz, J. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.044 · Cited by 555
Topical N-Grams: Phrase and Topic Discovery, with an Application to Information Retrieval
Wang, X., McCallum, A., & Wei, X. (2007) · Seventh IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 2007) · doi:10.1109/icdm.2007.86 · Cited by 482
Goh, K. H., Wang, L., Yeow, A. Y. K., Poh, H., Li, K., Yeow, J. J. L., & Tan, G. Y. H. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-20910-4 · Cited by 415
Computer-Assisted Text Analysis for Comparative Politics
Lucas, C., Nielsen, R. A., Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., Storer, A., & Tingley, D. (2015) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpu019 · Cited by 366
Metadata
- Authors
- Wallach, H. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning - ICML '06
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 2006
- Pages
- 977-984
- OpenAlex
- W2104210067
- Cited by
- 1,058
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.57
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Topic modeling: beyond bag-of-words. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1143844.1143967
- The paper
- Wallach, H. M. (2006). Topic modeling: beyond bag-of-words. Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning - ICML '06. https://doi.org/10.1145/1143844.1143967
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.