The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In VINI veritas: realistic and controlled network experimentation
Abstract
This paper describes VINI , a virtual network infrastructure that allows network researchers to evaluate their protocols and services in a realistic environment that also provides a high degree of control over network conditions. VINI allows researchers to deploy and evaluate their ideas with real routing software, traffic loads, and network events. To provide researchers flexibility in designing their experiments, VINI supports simultaneous experiments with arbitrary network topologies on a shared physical infrastructure. This paper tackles the following important design question: What set of concepts and techniques facilitate flexible, realistic, and controlled experimentation ( e.g. , multiple topologies and the ability to tweak routing algorithms) on a fixed physical infrastructure? We first present VINI's high-level design and the challenges of virtualizing a single network. We then present PL-VINI , an implementation of VINI on PlanetLab, running the "Internet In a Slice". Our evaluation of PL-VINI shows that it provides a realistic and controlled environment for evaluating new protocols and services.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kohler, E., Morris, R., Chen, B., Jannotti, J., & Kaashoek, M. F. (2000) · ACM Transactions on Computer Systems · doi:10.1145/354871.354874 · Cited by 2,413
Andersen, D., Balakrishnan, H., Kaashoek, F., & Morris, R. (2001) · Proceedings of the eighteenth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles · doi:10.1145/502034.502048 · Cited by 1,868
An integrated experimental environment for distributed systems and networks
White, B., Lepreau, J., Stoller, L. B., Ricci, R., Guruprasad, S., Newbold, M., Hibler, M., Barb, C., & Joglekar, A. A. (2002) · ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review · doi:10.1145/844128.844152 · Cited by 1,302
A blueprint for introducing disruptive technology into the Internet
Peterson, L., Anderson, T., Culler, D., & Roscoe, T. (2003) · ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review · doi:10.1145/774763.774772 · Cited by 752
Self-citationDetecting BGP configuration faults with static analysis
Feamster, N., & Balakrishnan, H. (2005) · doi:10.5555/1251203.1251207 · Cited by 307
Self-citationExperiences building PlanetLab
Peterson, L., Bavier, A. C., Fiuczynski, M. E., & Muir, S. (2006) · doi:10.5555/1298455.1298489 · Cited by 217
Self-citationMeasuring the effects of internet path faults on reactive routing
Feamster, N., Andersen, D. G., Balakrishnan, H., & Kaashoek, M. F. (2003) · ACM SIGMETRICS International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems (SIGMETRICS) · doi:10.1145/781027.781043 · Cited by 168
Self-citation
Cited by
Software-Defined Networking: A Comprehensive Survey
Kreutz, D., Ramos, F. M. V., Esteves Verissimo, P., Esteve Rothenberg, C., Azodolmolky, S., & Uhlig, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2014.2371999 · Cited by 5,050
Metadata
- Authors
- Bavier, A., Feamster, N., Huang, M., Peterson, L., & Rexford, J.
- Venue
- ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
- Published
- 2006-08-11
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 3-14
- ISSN
- 0146-4833 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2101296223
- Cited by
- 438
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 53.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In VINI veritas: realistic and controlled network experimentation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1151659.1159916
- The paper
- Bavier, A., Feamster, N., Huang, M., Peterson, L., & Rexford, J. (2006). In VINI veritas: realistic and controlled network experimentation. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review. https://doi.org/10.1145/1151659.1159916
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
