The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A multifaceted approach to understanding the botnet phenomenon
Abstract
The academic community has long acknowledged the existence of malicious botnets, however to date, very little is known about the behavior of these distributed computing platforms. To the best of our knowledge, botnet behavior has never been methodically studied, botnet prevalence on the Internet is mostly a mystery, and the botnet life cycle has yet to be modeled. Uncertainty abounds. In this paper, we attempt to clear the fog surrounding botnets by constructing a multifaceted and distributed measurement infrastructure. Throughout a period of more than three months, we used this infrastructure to track 192 unique IRC botnets of size ranging from a few hundred to several thousand infected end-hosts. Our results show that botnets represent a major contributor to unwanted Internet traffic - 27% of all malicious connection attempts observed from our distributed darknet can be directly attributed to botnet-related spreading activity. Furthermore, we discovered evidence of botnet infections in 11% of the 800,000 DNS domains we examined, indicating a high diversity among botnet victims. Taken as a whole, these results not only highlight the prominence of botnets, but also provide deep insights that may facilitate further research to curtail this phenomenon.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Spamming botnets: signatures and characteristics
Xie, Y., Yu, F., Achan, K., Panigrahy, R., Hulten, G., & Osipkov, I. (2008) · ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review · doi:10.1145/1402946.1402979 · Cited by 339
Dissecting a Social Botnet: Growth, Content and Influence in Twitter
Abokhodair, N., Yoo, D., & McDonald, D. W. (2015) · Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing · doi:10.1145/2675133.2675208 · Cited by 162
LOBO: Evaluation of Generalization Deficiencies in Twitter Bot Classifiers
Echeverra, J., De Cristofaro, E., Kourtellis, N., Leontiadis, I., Stringhini, G., & Zhou, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 34th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference · doi:10.1145/3274694.3274738 · Cited by 61
“Large quantities of malicious accounts are often created and controlled by single mis-creants, forming so-called botnets [1].”
Honeypot trace forensics: the observation viewpoint matters
Pham, V.-H., & Dacier, M. (2011) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2010.06.004 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Abu Rajab, M., Zarfoss, J., Monrose, F., & Terzis, A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2006-10-25
- Pages
- 41-52
- OpenAlex
- W2102671922
- Cited by
- 595
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 38.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A multifaceted approach to understanding the botnet phenomenon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1177080.1177086
- The paper
- Abu Rajab, M., Zarfoss, J., Monrose, F., & Terzis, A. (2006). A multifaceted approach to understanding the botnet phenomenon. Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement. https://doi.org/10.1145/1177080.1177086
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.