The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A scalable approach to attack graph generation
Abstract
Attack graphs are important tools for analyzing security vulnerabilities in enterprise networks. Previous work on attack graphs has not provided an account of the scalability of the graph generating process, and there is often a lack of logical formalism in the representation of attack graphs, which results in the attack graph being difficult to use and understand by human beings. Pioneer work by Sheyner, et al. is the first attack-graph tool based on formal logical techniques, namely model-checking. However, when applied to moderate-sized networks, Sheyner's tool encountered a significant exponential explosion problem. This paper describes a new approach to represent and generate attack graphs. We propose logical attack graphs, which directly illustrate logical dependencies among attack goals and configuration information. A logical attack graph always has size polynomial to the network being analyzed. Our attack graph generation tool builds upon MulVAL, a network security analyzer based on logical programming. We demonstrate how to produce a derivation trace in the MulVAL logic-programming engine, and how to use the trace to generate a logical attack graph in quadratic time. We show experimental evidence that our logical attack graph generation algorithm is very efficient. We have generated logical attack graphs for fully connected networks of 1000 machines using a Pentium 4 CPU with 1GB of RAM.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Alshamrani, A., Myneni, S., Chowdhary, A., & Huang, D. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2019.2891891 · Cited by 656
Towards a Zero-Trust Micro-segmentation Network Security Strategy: An Evaluation Framework
Basta, N., Ikram, M., Kaafar, M. A., & Walker, A. (2022) · NOMS 2022-2022 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium · doi:10.1109/noms54207.2022.9789888 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Ou, X., Boyer, W. F., & McQueen, M. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 13th ACM conference on Computer and communications security
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2006-10-30
- Pages
- 336-345
- ISSN
- 1543-7221 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2110908300
- Cited by
- 617
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.03
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A scalable approach to attack graph generation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1180405.1180446
- The paper
- Ou, X., Boyer, W. F., & McQueen, M. A. (2006). A scalable approach to attack graph generation. Proceedings of the 13th ACM conference on Computer and communications security. https://doi.org/10.1145/1180405.1180446
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.