The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Survey on Advanced Persistent Threats: Techniques, Solutions, Challenges, and Research Opportunities
Abstract
Threats that have been primarily targeting nation states and their associated entities have expanded the target zone to include the private and corporate sectors. This class of threats, well known as advanced persistent threats (APTs), are those that every nation and well-established organization fears and wants to protect itself against. While nation-sponsored APT attacks will always be marked by their sophistication, APT attacks that have become prominent in corporate sectors do not make it any less challenging for the organizations. The rate at which the attack tools and techniques are evolving is making any existing security measures inadequate. As defenders strive to secure every endpoint and every link within their networks, attackers are finding new ways to penetrate into their target systems. With each day bringing new forms of malware, having new signatures and behavior that is close to normal, a single threat detection system would not suffice. While it requires time and patience to perform APT, solutions that adapt to the changing behavior of APT attacker(s) are required. Several works have been published on detecting an APT attack at one or two of its stages, but very limited research exists in detecting APT as a whole from reconnaissance to cleanup, as such a solution demands complex correlation and fine-grained behavior analysis of users and systems within and across networks. Through this survey paper, we intend to bring all those methods and techniques that could be used to detect different stages of APT attacks, learning methods that need to be applied and where to make your threat detection framework smart and undecipherable for those adapting APT attackers. We also present different case studies of APT attacks, different monitoring methods, and mitigation methods to be employed for fine-grained control of security of a networked system. We conclude this paper with different challenges in defending against APT and opportunities for further research, ending with a note on what we learned during our writing of this paper.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1541880.1541882 · Cited by 11,687
A Survey of Outlier Detection Methodologies
Hodge, V., & Austin, J. (2004) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-004-4304-y · Cited by 3,596
Anomaly-based network intrusion detection: Techniques, systems and challenges
García-Teodoro, P., Díaz-Verdejo, J., Maciá-Fernández, G., & Vázquez, E. (2009) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2008.08.003 · Cited by 2,085
Stuxnet: Dissecting a cyberwarfare weapon
Langner, R. (2011) · IEEE Security & Privacy Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2011.67 · Cited by 1,922
Network Anomaly Detection: Methods, Systems and Tools
Bhuyan, M. H., Bhattacharyya, D. K., & Kalita, J. K. (2014) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2013.052213.00046 · Cited by 1,348
Anomaly Detection for Discrete Sequences: A Survey
Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2010.235 · Cited by 715
Panorama: capturing system-wide information flow for malware detection and analysis
Yin, H., Song, D., Egele, M., Kruegel, C., & Kirda, E. (2007) · Proceedings of the 14th ACM conference on Computer and communications security · doi:10.1145/1315245.1315261 · Cited by 683
Common Vulnerability Scoring System
Mell, P., Scarfone, K., & Romanosky, S. (2006) · IEEE Security and Privacy Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2006.145 · Cited by 680
A scalable approach to attack graph generation
Ou, X., Boyer, W. F., & McQueen, M. A. (2006) · Proceedings of the 13th ACM conference on Computer and communications security · doi:10.1145/1180405.1180446 · Cited by 617
Hong, J. (2012) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/2063176.2063197 · Cited by 551
Cited by
Deep Learning Based Attack Detection for Cyber-Physical System Cybersecurity: A Survey
Zhang, J., Pan, L., Han, Q.-L., Chen, C., Wen, S., & Xiang, Y. (2022) · IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica · doi:10.1109/jas.2021.1004261 · Cited by 432
UNICORN: Runtime Provenance-Based Detector for Advanced Persistent Threats
Han, X., Pasquier, T., Bates, A., Mickens, J., & Seltzer, M. (2020) · Proceedings 2020 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium · doi:10.14722/ndss.2020.24046 · Cited by 349
A Unified Deep Learning Anomaly Detection and Classification Approach for Smart Grid Environments
Siniosoglou, I., Radoglou-Grammatikis, P., Efstathopoulos, G., Fouliras, P., & Sarigiannidis, P. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2021.3078381 · Cited by 266
A review of state-of-the-art malware attack trends and defense mechanisms
Ferdous, J., Islam, R., Mahboubi, A., & Islam, M. Z. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3328351 · Cited by 98
The Threat of Offensive AI to Organizations
Mirsky, Y., Demontis, A., Kotak, J., Shankar, R., Gelei, D., Yang, L., Zhang, X., Pintor, M., Lee, W., Elovici, Y., et al. (2023) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2022.103006 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Alshamrani, A., Myneni, S., Chowdhary, A., & Huang, D.
- Venue
- IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1851-1877
- ISSN
- 1553-877X (ISSN-L)
- 2373-745X
- OpenAlex
- W2910711617
- Cited by
- 656
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 23.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Survey on Advanced Persistent Threats: Techniques, Solutions, Challenges, and Research Opportunities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/comst.2019.2891891
- The paper
- Alshamrani, A., Myneni, S., Chowdhary, A., & Huang, D. (2019). A Survey on Advanced Persistent Threats: Techniques, Solutions, Challenges, and Research Opportunities. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2019.2891891
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.