The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theoretical reflections on agile development methodologies
Abstract
The traditional goal of optimization and control is making way for learning and innovation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action
Checkoway, B., & Schon, D. A. (1985) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.2307/3324262 · Cited by 21,268
The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action
Stewart, C. J. (1984) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/0738-3991(84)90022-3 · Cited by 19,752
Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997) · Reis · doi:10.2307/40183951 · Cited by 11,113 · cited 2×
“Constantly reexamining assumptions and evaluating discrepancies against existing norms and values fosters double-loop learning [1], which is “generative” by increasing both learning and the ability to innovate and use change to one’s advantage [12].”
BackgroundMorgan, G. (1986) · Cited by 5,650
Strategy safari: a guided tour through the wilds of strategic management
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-3419 · Cited by 1,738
The Leaders New Work: Building Learning Organizations
Senge, P. M. (2017) · Leadership Perspectives · doi:10.4324/9781315250601-6 · Cited by 1,533
(1998) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-5529-2 · Cited by 1,235
Strategy Safari: A Guided Tour through The Wilds of Strategic Management
(1999) · Work Study · doi:10.1108/ws.1999.07948bae.002 · Cited by 885
Agile Software Development Ecosystems
Highsmith, J. (2002) · International Linear Collider · Cited by 874
Systems Methodology for the Management Sciences
Jackson, M. C. (1991) · Contemporary Systems Thinking · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2632-6 · Cited by 599
Cited by
Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review
Dybå, T., & Dingsøyr, T. (2008) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2008.01.006 · Cited by 2,668
A decade of agile methodologies: Towards explaining agile software development
Dingsøyr, T., Nerur, S., Balijepally, V., & Moe, N. B. (2012) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2012.02.033 · Cited by 1,113
Self-citationLee, G., & Xia, W. (2010) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20721416 · Cited by 614
A teamwork model for understanding an agile team: A case study of a Scrum project
Moe, N. B., Dingsøyr, T., & Dybå, T. (2010) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2009.11.004 · Cited by 526
Self-Organizing Roles on Agile Software Development Teams
Hoda, R., Noble, J., & Marshall, S. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2012.30 · Cited by 330
Metadata
- Authors
- Nerur, S., & Balijepally, V.
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 79-83
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W1998264665
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 49.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theoretical reflections on agile development methodologies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1226736.1226739
- The paper
- Nerur, S., & Balijepally, V. (2007). Theoretical reflections on agile development methodologies. Communications of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1226736.1226739
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
