Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The literature review was carried out according to the review method presented in (Dybå & Dingsøyr, 2008) to ensure maximum literature coverage, include all relevant studies and collect and synthesize the data from these studies in a meaningful way.
“The literature review presented in this article was carried out according to the review method presented in (Dybå & Dingsøyr, 2008) to ensure maximum literature coverage, include all relevant studies and collect and synthesize the data from these studies in a meaningful way.”
From The effect of using Kahoot! for learning – A literature review (2020) · cites this paper as Dybå & Dingsøyr, 2008
The defined search process by Dybå et al. was adopted for screening relevant papers.
“For the screening of relevant papers, the defined search process by Dybå et al. [19] was adopted.”
From A Comprehensive Analysis of Recent Deep and Federated-Learning-Based Methodologies for Brain Tumor Diagnosis (2022) · cites this paper as [19]
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148 · see citing works
Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook
(1994) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80231-2 · Cited by 48,420 · see citing works
A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales
Cohen, J. (1960) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316446002000104 · Cited by 42,398 · see citing works
(1999) · Cited by 28,356 · see citing works
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048 · see citing works
Basics of Qualitative Research
Ozanne, J. L., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1992) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3172751 · Cited by 17,852 · see citing works
(2002) · Cited by 13,211 · see citing works
(1990) · Cited by 11,110 · see citing works
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
(2004) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490 · Cited by 8,477 · see citing works
Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change
Beck, K. L., & Andres, C. (2000) · Cited by 5,855 · see citing works
Toyota production system: beyond large-scale production
Ohno, T., & Rosen, C. B. (1998) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 4,544 · see citing works
Soft Systems Methodology in Action
Gough, T., Checkland, P. B., & Scholes, J. (1991) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.2307/2583669 · Cited by 3,414 · see citing works
Methodological fit in management field research
Edmondson, A. C., & McManus, S. E. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586086 · Cited by 3,248 · see citing works
Agile Software Development with SCRUM
Schwaber, K., & Beedle, M. (2001) · Cited by 2,639 · see citing works
The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction
Kruchten, P. B. (1998) · Cited by 2,597 · see citing works
Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies
Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,191 · see citing works
The new new product development game
(1986) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1016/0737-6782(86)90053-6 · Cited by 1,614 · see citing works
Preliminary guidelines for empirical research in software engineering
Kitchenham, B. A., Pfleeger, S. L., Pickard, L. M., Jones, P. W., Hoaglin, D. C., Emam, K. E., & Rosenberg, J. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2002.1027796 · Cited by 1,514 · see citing works
The capability maturity model: Guidelines for improving the software process
(1996) · Computers & Mathematics with Applications · doi:10.1016/s0898-1221(96)90461-7 · Cited by 1,453 · see citing works
Balancing Agility and Discipline: A Guide for the Perplexed
BOEHM, B. W. (2004) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24675-6_1 · Cited by 1,178 · see citing works
Iterative and incremental developments. a brief history
Larman, C., & Basili, V. R. (2003) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2003.1204375 · Cited by 1,164 · see citing works
Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example
Britten, N., Campbell, R., Pope, C., Donovan, J., Morgan, M., & Pill, R. (2002) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1258/135581902320432732 · Cited by 1,110 · see citing works
Challenges of migrating to agile methodologies
Nerur, S., Mahapatra, R., & Mangalaraj, G. (2005) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1060710.1060712 · Cited by 1,018 · see citing works
Lean Software Development: An Agile Toolkit
Poppendieck, M., & Poppendieck, T. (2003) · International Linear Collider · Cited by 972 · see citing works
Soft Systems Methodology in Action
Rosenhead, J. (1991) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.1991.37 · Cited by 966 · see citing works
Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change (2nd Edition)
Beck, K. L., & Andres, C. (2004) · Addison-Wesley Professional eBooks · Cited by 934 · see citing works
Get ready for agile methods, with care
BOEHM, B. W. (2002) · Computer · doi:10.1109/2.976920 · Cited by 912 · see citing works
Agile manufacturing: A framework for research and development
Gunasekaran, A. (1999) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/s0925-5273(98)00222-9 · Cited by 809 · see citing works
Avison, D., Lau, F., Myers, M. D., & Nielsen, P. A. (1999) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/291469.291479 · Cited by 784 · see citing works
Agile Software Development Methods: Review and AnalysisPreprint
Abrahamsson, P., Salo, O., Ronkainen, J., & Warsta, J. (2017) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1709.08439 · Cited by 744 · see citing works
A survey of controlled experiments in software engineering
Sjoeberg, D. I. K., Hannay, J. E., Hansen, O., Kampenes, V. B., Karahasanović, A., Liborg, N.-K., & Rekdal, A. C. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2005.97 · Cited by 684 · see citing works
New directions on agile methods: a comparative analysis
Abrahamsson, P., Warsta, J., Siponen, M. T., & Ronkainen, J. K. (2003) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1109/icse.2003.1201204 · Cited by 667 · see citing works
A Practical Guide to Feature-Driven Development
Palmer, S. R., & Felsing, M. (2002) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 625 · see citing works
Crystal Clear: A Human-Powered Methodology for Small Teams
Cockburn, A. (2004) · International Linear Collider · Cited by 528 · see citing works
Evidence-based software engineering for practitioners
Dyba, T., Kitchenham, B. A., & Jørgensen, M. (2005) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/ms.2005.6 · Cited by 463 · see citing works
Proceedings of the 30th international conference on Software engineering
Rajan, A., Whalen, M. W., & Heimdahl, M. P. E. (2008) · Cited by 458 · see citing works
O’Regan, G. (2002) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-22454-1_4 · Cited by 455 · see citing works
Agile software development: it's about feedback and change
Williams, L. A., & Cockburn, A. (2003) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2003.1204373 · Cited by 430 · see citing works
Applying Systematic Reviews to Diverse Study Types: An Experience Report
Dyba, T., Dingsoyr, T., & Hanssen, G. K. (2007) · First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007) · doi:10.1109/esem.2007.59 · Cited by 391 · see citing works
The Future of Empirical Methods in Software Engineering Research
Sjøberg, D. I. K., Dybå, T., & Jørgensen, M. (2007) · Future of Software Engineering (FOSE) · doi:10.1109/fose.2007.30 · Cited by 390 · see citing works
Self-citationTheoretical reflections on agile development methodologies
Nerur, S., & Balijepally, V. (2007) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1226736.1226739 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
A review of agile manufacturing systems
Sanchez, L. M., & Nagi, R. (2001) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207540110068790 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Greenhalgh, P., & Greenhalgh, T. (1999) · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Ackoff's Best: His Classic Writings on Management
Ackoff, R. L. (1999) · Cited by 334 · see citing works
A Visual Text Mining approach for Systematic Reviews
Malheiros, V., Höhn, E. N., de Pinho, R., Mendonça, M., & Maldonado, J. C. (2007) · Proceedings of the ... ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement/International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement · doi:10.1109/esem.2007.21 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
On the effectiveness of the test-first approach to programming
Erdogmus, H., Morisio, M., & Torchiano, M. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2005.37 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Agile Modeling, Agile Software Development, and Extreme Programming
Erickson, J., Lyytinen, K., & Siau, K. L. (2005) · Journal of Database Management · doi:10.4018/jdm.2005100105 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, D. (2007) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Explaining software developer acceptance of methodologies: a comparison of five theoretical models
Riemenschneider, C. K., Hardgrave, B. C., & Davis, F. D. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2002.1158287 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
An Introduction to Agile Methods
Cohen, D., Lindvall, M., & Costa, P. (2004) · Advances in computers · doi:10.1016/s0065-2458(03)62001-2 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Sabharwal, N., Rathore, R., & Agrawal, U. (2021) · Apress eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4842-7505-4_5 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Selecting a project's methodology
Cockburn, A. (2000) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/52.854070 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Assumptions Underlying Agile Software-Development Processes
Turk, D., Robert, F., & Rumpe⋆, B. (2005) · Journal of Database Management · doi:10.4018/jdm.2005100104 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Toward a conceptual framework of agile methods
Conboy, K., & Fitzgerald, B. F. (2004) · doi:10.1145/1029997.1030005 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Combining Agile Methods with Stage-Gate Project Management
Karlström, D., & Runeson, P. (2005) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/ms.2005.59 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Agile Software Development: Adaptive Systems Principles and Best Practices
Meso, P. N., & Jain, R. (2006) · Information Systems Management · doi:10.1201/1078.10580530/46108.23.3.20060601/93704.3 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Extreme Programming Refactored: The Case Against XP
Stephens, M., & Rosenberg, D. (2003) · Apress eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4302-0810-5 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Changing the paradigm of software engineering
Rajlich, V. (2006) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1145287.1145289 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
A case study on the impact of scrum on overtime and customer satisfaction
Mann, C., & Maurer, F. (2006) · doi:10.1109/adc.2005.1 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
An Ethnographic Study of XP Practice
Sharp, H., & Robinson, H. (2004) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1023/b:emse.0000039884.79385.54 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Project Management in Plan-Based and Agile Companies
Ceschi, M., Sillitti, A., Succi, G., & Panfilis, S. D. (2005) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/ms.2005.75 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Psp(sm): A Self-Improvement Process for Software Engineers
Humphrey, W. S. (2005) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Future of Software Engineering (FOSE '07)
(2007) · doi:10.1109/ieeeconf12703.2007 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Checklists for Software Engineering Case Study Research
Host, M., & Runeson, P. (2007) · Proceedings of the ... ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement/International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement · doi:10.1109/esem.2007.46 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Improvisation in Small Software Organizations
Dybå, T. (2000) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/52.877872 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Self-citationAre Two Heads Better than One? On the Effectiveness of Pair Programming
Dybå, T., Arisholm, E., Sjøberg, D. I. K., Hannay, J. E., & Shull, F. J. (2007) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/ms.2007.158 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Self-citationExploring Extreme Programming in Context: An Industrial Case Study
Layman, L., Williams, L. A., & Cunningham, L. A. (2004) · Agile Development Conference · doi:10.1109/adevc.2004.15 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Is internet-speed software development different?
Baskerville, R., Ramesh, B., Levine, L., Pries‐Heje, J., & Slaughter, S. A. (2003) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/ms.2003.1241369 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Questioning Extreme Programming
McBreen, P., & Beck, K. L. (2002) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Web-based Agile software development
Aoyama, M. (1998) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/52.730844 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Lean Software Development: Two Case Studies
Middleton, P. J. (2001) · Software quality journal · doi:10.1023/a:1013754402981 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
The XP Customer Role in Practice: Three Studies
Martin, A. J., Biddle, R., & Noble, J. (2004) · Agile Development Conference · doi:10.1109/adevc.2004.23 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Introducing an Agile Process in a Software Maintenance and Evolution Organization
Svensson, H., & Höst, M. (2005) · Proceedings of the ... European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering/Proceedings of the European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering · doi:10.1109/csmr.2005.33 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Mannaro, K., Melis, M., & Marchesi, M. (2004) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24853-8_19 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
For the Special issue on Qualitative Software Engineering Research
Dittrich, Y., John, M., Singer, J., & Tessem, B. (2007) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2007.02.009 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Managing Uncertainty in Requirements: A Survey in Documentation-Driven and Agile Companies
Sillitti, A., Ceschi, M., Russo, B., & Succi, G. (2005) · IEEE International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS) · doi:10.1109/metrics.2005.29 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Is Extreme Programming Just Old Wine in New Bottles
Merisalo-Rantanen, H., Tuunanen, T., & Rossi, M. (2005) · Journal of Database Management · doi:10.4018/jdm.2005100103 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Extreme programming: a survey of empirical data from a controlled case study
Abrahamsson, P., & Koskela, J. (2004) · International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/isese.2004.19 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
On-Site Customer in an XP Project: Empirical Results from a Case Study
Koskela, J., & Abrahamsson, P. (2004) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-30181-3_1 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Perceptions of Agile Practices: A Student Survey
Melnik, G., & Maurer, F. (2002) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45672-4_27 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
The impact of the Abilene Paradox on double-loop learning in an agile team
McAvoy, J., & Butler, T. (2007) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2007.02.012 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Analyses of an Agile Methodology Implementation
Ilieva, S., Ivanov, P., & Stefanova, E. (2004) · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Toward a Conceptual Framework of Agile Methods
Conboy, K., & Fitzgerald, B. F. (2004) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-27777-4_11 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Session details: Flexible and distributed software processes: old petunias in new bowls?
Ågerfalk, P. J., & Fitzgerald, B. F. (2006) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3262237 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Jokela, T., & Abrahamsson, P. (2004) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24659-6_28 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Organisational culture and XP: three case studies
Robinson, H., & Sharp, H. (2006) · doi:10.1109/adc.2005.36 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
The Characteristics of XP Teams
Robinson, H., & Sharp, H. (2004) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24853-8_16 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
The Role of Knowledge Creation in Adopting Extreme Programming Model: An Empirical Study
Bahli, B., & Abou‐Zeid, E. (2006) · doi:10.1109/itict.2005.1609616 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
A formal experiment comparing extreme programming with traditional software construction
Macias, F., Holcombe, M., & Gheorghe, M. (2004) · doi:10.1109/enc.2003.1232877 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
From Cards to Code: How Extreme Programming Re-Embodies Programming as a Collective Practice
Mackenzie, A., & Monk, S. (2004) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1023/b:cosu.0000014873.27735.10 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
The Social Side of Technical Practices
Robinson, H., & Sharp, H. (2005) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11499053_12 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Comparison of Student Experiences with Plan-Driven and Agile Methodologies
Wellington, C. A., Briggs, T., & Girard, C. (2006) · 2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) · doi:10.1109/fie.2005.1611951 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Experiences in Learning XP Practices: A Qualitative Study
Tessem, B. (2003) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-44870-5_17 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Revisiting my campaign statement
Patterson, D. A. (2006) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1125944.1125965 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Svensson, H., & Höst, M. (2005) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11497455_38 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Personality characteristics in an XP team
Young, S., Edwards, H. M., McDonald, S., & Thompson, J. B. (2005) · ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · doi:10.1145/1082983.1083123 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Martin, A., Biddle, R., & Noble, J. (2004) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24853-8_6 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Fault-Prone Filtering: Detection of Fault-Prone Modules Using Spam Filtering Technique
Mizuno, O., Ikami, S., Nakaichi, S., & Kikuno, T. (2007) · Proceedings of the ... ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement/International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement · doi:10.1109/esem.2007.29 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Development Life Cycle Management: A Multiproject Experiment
Далчер, Д., Benediktsson, O., & Thorbergsson, H. (2005) · IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems (ECBS) · doi:10.1109/ecbs.2005.32 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Experiences in applying agile software development practices in new product development.
Dagnino, A., Smiley, K. J., Srikanth, H., Antón, A. I., & Williams, L. A. (2004) · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Shull, F. J. (2007) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/ms.2007.152 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Fruhling, A., Tyser, K., & de Vreede, G. (2005) · Proceedings of the ... Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences/Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.1109/hicss.2005.257 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 105 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update
Petersen, K., Vakkalanka, S., & Kuzniarz, L. (2015) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2015.03.007 · Cited by 2,669 · see citing works
“A set of studies also used existing literature studies [32,51,52] as templates for their systematic reviews.”
Where Is Current Research on Blockchain Technology?—A Systematic Review
Yli-Huumo, J., Ko, D., Choi, S., Park, S., & Smolander, K. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0163477 · Cited by 2,317 · see citing works
“For screening the relevant papers, we used a process inspired by Dybåand Dingsøyr [14].”
MethodA decade of agile methodologies: Towards explaining agile software development
Dingsøyr, T., Nerur, S., Balijepally, V., & Moe, N. B. (2012) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2012.02.033 · Cited by 1,118 · see citing works
“(2005), and Dybå and Dingsøyr (2008).”
InfluentialSelf-citationA systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering
Kitchenham, B., & Brereton, P. (2013) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2013.07.010 · Cited by 1,094 · see citing works
“Case Study (13) Example (11) Lessons learnt (6) Opinion Survey (5) Tertiary Study (5) Small Experiment (4)”
BackgroundMunn, Z., Aromataris, E., Tufanaru, C., Stern, C., Porritt, K., Farrow, J., Lockwood, C., Stephenson, M., Moola, S., Lizarondo, L., et al. (2019) · International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare · doi:10.1097/xeb.0000000000000152 · Cited by 977 · see citing works
Challenges and success factors for large-scale agile transformations: A systematic literature review
Dikert, K., Paasivaara, M., & Lassenius, C. (2016) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.013 · Cited by 890 · see citing works
The effect of using Kahoot! for learning – A literature review
Wang, A. I., & Tahir, R. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103818 · Cited by 883 · see citing works
Does Agile work? — A quantitative analysis of agile project success
Serrador, P. M., & Pinto, J. K. (2015) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.01.006 · Cited by 850 · see citing works
“A quantitative analysis of agile project success”
Collins, C., Dennehy, D., Conboy, K., & Mikalef, P. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102383 · Cited by 783 · see citing works
A systematic mapping study on technical debt and its management
Li, Z., Avgeriou, P., & Liang, P. (2014) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2014.12.027 · Cited by 746 · see citing works
“Q2 and Q5 were adopted from [20] and [21] while Q3 and Q4 are formulated according to our study topic and RQs.”
InfluentialAgile project management with Scrum
Azanha, A., Argoud, A. R. T. T., de Camargo, J. B., & Antoniolli, P. D. (2017) · International Journal of Managing Projects in Business · doi:10.1108/ijmpb-06-2016-0054 · Cited by 734 · see citing works
Recommended Steps for Thematic Synthesis in Software Engineering
Cruzes, D. S., & Dyba, T. (2011) · 2011 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement · doi:10.1109/esem.2011.36 · Cited by 960 · see citing works
“Many of the these methods have much in common with meta-ethnography, as originally described by Noblit and Hare [37], and used in SE by Dybå and Dingsøyr [21].”
Lee, G., & Xia, W. (2010) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20721416 · Cited by 616 · see citing works
“To fill this gap, researchers have called for structured, rigorous empirical studies on agile development with a common research agenda (Dybå and Dingsøyr 2008).”
A teamwork model for understanding an agile team: A case study of a Scrum project
Moe, N. B., Dingsøyr, T., & Dybå, T. (2009) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2009.11.004 · Cited by 543 · see citing works
“However, despite the popularity of the method, a systematic review of empirical studies of agile development [16] found only one case study of Scrum in the research literature prior to 2006.”
Self-citationSystematic literature review of machine learning based software development effort estimation models
Wen, J., Li, S., Lin, Z., Hu, Y., & Huang, C. (2011) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2011.09.002 · Cited by 531 · see citing works
“, QA1, QA7, QA8, and QA10) are derived from [39].”
A systematic literature review on agile requirements engineering practices and challenges
Inayat, I., Salim, S. S., Marczak, S. D. S., Daneva, M., & Shamshirband, S. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.046 · Cited by 531 · see citing works
“As Dybå and Dingsøyr (2008) indicate, search strings in software engineering are language dependent; thus, there is a possibility of missing relevant studies during each search.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRole of IoT Technology in Agriculture: A Systematic Literature Review
Farooq, M. S., Riaz, S., Abid, A., Umer, T., & Zikria, Y. B. (2020) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics9020319 · Cited by 541 · see citing works
“For this purpose, we used the search process defined by Dybå and Dingsøyr [21] for the screening of relevant papers.”
MethodA review and future direction of agile, business intelligence, analytics and data science
Larson, D., & Chang, V. (2016) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.04.013 · Cited by 427 · see citing works
A Systematic Survey of Program Comprehension through Dynamic Analysis
Cornelissen, B., Zaidman, A., Arie Van Deursen, A., Moonen, L., & Koschke, R. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2009.28 · Cited by 421 · see citing works
“In a first pass, we study all papers and write down words of interest that could be relevant for a particular facet (e.g., “survey,” or “feature analysis” for the activity facet).”
BackgroundSoftware development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study
Paternoster, N., Giardino, C., Unterkalmsteiner, M., Gorschek, T., & Abrahamsson, P. (2014) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2014.04.014 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
“Threats to study selection and data extraction [57] have been mitigated with an up-front definition of the inclusion / exclusion criteria [4].”
Identifying some important success factors in adopting agile software development practices
Misra, S. C., Kumar, V., & Kumar, U. (2009) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2009.05.052 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
Mangaroska, K., & Giannakos, M. N. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2018.2868673 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
“These criteria were informed by CASP and adapted for the purpose of this study following the Quality Assessment form used in a systematic review study about empirical studies of agile software development [52].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAgile Requirements Engineering: A systematic literature review
Schön, E.-M., Thomaschewski, J., & Escalona, M. J. (2016) · Computer Standards & Interfaces · doi:10.1016/j.csi.2016.08.011 · Cited by 360 · see citing works
Salleh, N., Mendes, E., & Grundy, J. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2010.59 · Cited by 361 · see citing works
“Also in 2007, Dyba and Dingsoyr [20] carried out an SLR of Agile Software Development empirical studies examining benefits, limitations, and strength of evidence for agile methods.”
Research synthesis in software engineering: A tertiary study
Cruzes, D. S., & Dybå, T. (2011) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2011.01.004 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
Self-citationTailored gamification in education: A literature review and future agenda
Oliveira, W., Hamari, J., Shi, L., Toda, A. M., Rodrigues, L., Palomino, P. T., & Isotani, S. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11122-4 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
Using Scrum in Global Software Development: A Systematic Literature Review
Hossain, E., Babar, M. A., & Paik, H.-Y. (2009) · IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE) · doi:10.1109/icgse.2009.25 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
A Descriptive Literature Review and Classification of Cloud Computing Research
Yang, H., & Tate, M. (2012) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.03102 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
“Following a staged selection process [Dyba and Dingsoyr, 2008], the remaining 626 articles in the database were then scanned and filtered in three rounds.”
Teamwork quality and project success in software development: A survey of agile development teams
Lindsjørn, Y., Sjøberg, D. I. K., Dingsøyr, T., Bergersen, G. R., & Dybå, T. (2016) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2016.09.028 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
“Agile development methods are used as an umbrella term to describe a number of development methods (Dingsøyr et al., 2012; Dybå and Dingsøyr, 2008).”
MethodSelf-citationThe shape of digital transformation : a systematic literature review
Henriette, E., Feki, M., & Boughzala, I. (2015) · HAL · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Empirical studies on the Maker Movement, a promising approach to learning: A literature review
Papavlasopoulou, S., Giannakos, M. N., & Jaccheri, L. (2017) · Entertainment Computing · doi:10.1016/j.entcom.2016.09.002 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Exploring principles of user-centered agile software development: A literature review
Brhel, M., Meth, H., Maedche, A., & Werder, K. (2015) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2015.01.004 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
User-Centered Design and Agile Methods: A Systematic Review
da Silva, T. S., Martin, A., Maurer, F., & Silveira, M. S. (2011) · Agile Conference · doi:10.1109/agile.2011.24 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
“In addition, following the example of [6], we handsearched all volumes of the following conference proceedings for research papers and experience reports on UCD and Agile: • XP • XP/Agile Universe”
MethodWhat Do We Know about Agile Software Development?
Dyba, T., & Dingsøyr, T. (2009) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/ms.2009.145 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Self-citation‘Lots done, more to do’: the current state of agile systems development research
Abrahamsson, P., Conboy, K., & Wang, X. (2009) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2009.27 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Strength of evidence in systematic reviews in software engineering
Dybå, T., & Dingsøyr, T. (2008) · Proceedings of the ... ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement/International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement · doi:10.1145/1414004.1414034 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Self-citationEco-innovation determinants in manufacturing SMEs: Systematic review and research directions
Pacheco, D. A. D. J., ten Caten, C. S., Jung, C. F., Ribeiro, J. L. D., Navas, H. V. G., & Machado, V. A. C. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.049 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Variability in Software Systems—A Systematic Literature Review
Galster, M., Weyns, D., Tofan, D., Michalik, B., & Avgeriou, P. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2013.56 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
“[29], we adopted the quality assessment instrument used in [41].”
The impact of inadequate customer collaboration on self-organizing Agile teams
Hoda, R., Noble, J., & Marshall, S. (2011) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2010.10.009 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
“Unlike the product owner [7,13], the story owner was only responsible for one story at a time.”
BackgroundInfluentialThe agility construct on project management theory
Conforto, E. C., Amaral, D. C., da Silva, S. L., Felippo, A. D., & Kamikawachi, D. S. L. (2016) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.01.007 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
“Several studies about the application of the agile methods are found in the literature, especially for software development (Dybå and Dingsøyr, 2008).”
Self-Organizing Roles on Agile Software Development Teams
Hoda, R., Noble, J., & Marshall, S. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2012.30 · Cited by 330 · see citing works
“In contrast, research on Scrum is scarce, despite Scrum being arguably the most popular Agile method used in the industry [32], [51].”
Laanti, M., Salo, O., & Abrahamsson, P. (2010) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2010.11.010 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Petersen, K., & Wohlin, C. (2009) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2009.03.036 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
“State of the art: In order to identify from literature which issues and advantages exist, the systematic review on agile methods [4] is used as an input.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA systematic review of evaluation of variability management approaches in software product lines
Chen, L., & Babar, M. A. (2010) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2010.12.006 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Behavioral software engineering: A definition and systematic literature review
Lenberg, P., FELDT, R. H., & Wallgren, L. G. (2015) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2015.04.084 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Agile, Traditional, and Hybrid Approaches to Project Success: Is Hybrid a Poor Second Choice?
Gemino, A., Reich, B. H., & Serrador, P. M. (2020) · Project Management Journal · doi:10.1177/8756972820973082 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
The relationship between organizational culture and the deployment of agile methods
Iivari, J., & Iivari, N. (2010) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2010.10.008 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
“Although a recent study of Lee and Xia [56] casts doubt on the significant positive relationship between software development agility and the project success, there is not definite empirical evidence on this relationship [26].”
Continuous deployment of software intensive products and services: A systematic mapping study
Rodríguez, P., Haghighatkhah, A., Lwakatare, L. E., Teppola, S., Suomalainen, T., Eskeli, J., Karvonen, T., Kuvaja, P., Verner, J. M., & Oivo, M. (2016) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2015.12.015 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
“However, the focus in [26] is di ff erent from a review of CD as most primary studies included focus on agile methods at the team level instead of integration of the complete R&D organization.”
BackgroundHauge, Ø., Ayala, C. P., & Conradi, R. (2010) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2010.05.008 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Multimodal data capabilities for learning: What can multimodal data tell us about learning?
Sharma, K., & Giannakos, M. (2020) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12993 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
“We applied eight quality criteria (see Appendix A ) informed by related works (eg, Dybå & Dingsøyr, 2008 ).”
MethodDingsøyr, T., Moe, N. B., Fægri, T. E., & Seim, E. A. (2017) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-017-9524-2 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
“Agile methods have been criticized for lack of focus on architecture, the little scientific support for claims in the agile community, and for being applicable only to small teams (Dybå and Dingsøyr 2008).”
MethodSelf-citationDeveloping a grounded theory to explain the practices of self-organizing Agile teams
Hoda, R., Noble, J., & Marshall, S. (2011) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-011-9161-0 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Factors associated with the software development agility of successful projects
Sheffield, J., & Lemétayer, J. (2012) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.09.011 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Acuña, S. T., Gómez, M. N., & Juristo, N. (2008) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2008.08.006 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Perspectives on iteration in design and development
Wynn, D. C., & Eckert, C. M. (2016) · Research in Engineering Design · doi:10.1007/s00163-016-0226-3 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
A systematic mapping study of software product lines testing
Neto, P. A. D. M. S., Machado, I., McGregor, J. D., de Almeida, E. S., & Meira, S. R. D. L. (2010) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2010.12.003 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
“In addition to general inclusion/exclusion criteria, the quality evaluation mechanism, usually applied in systematic reviews [18,19,44], was applied in this study in order to assess the trustworthiness of the primary studies.”
Hybrid software and system development in practice: waterfall, scrum, and beyond
Kuhrmann, M., Diebold, P., Münch, J., Tell, P., Garousi, V., Felderer, M., Trektere, K., McCaffery, F., Linssen, O., Hanser, E., et al. (2017) · International Conference on Software and System Process · doi:10.1145/3084100.3084104 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
“Moreover, Theocharis et al. [20] found an extensive knowledge base on agile software development, e.g., Dybå and Dingsøyr [9] or the continuously updated State of Agile Survey [22].”
BackgroundForty years of research on personality in software engineering: A mapping study
CRUZ, S. P. S., da Silva, F. Q. B., & Capretz, L. F. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.008 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
“Precisions lower than 2% have been reported in several well-known systematic reviews in software engineering Sjøberg et al. (2005), Dyba and Dingsøyr (2008), Beecham et al. (2008), and da Silva et al. (2012).”
What have we learnt from 10 years of fintech research? a scientometric analysis
Liu, J., Li, X.-R., & Wang, S. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120022 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Systematic literature reviews in agile software development: A tertiary study
Hoda, R., Salleh, N., Grundy, J., & Mien, T. H. (2017) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2017.01.007 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Managing supply chain resilience to pursue business and environmental strategies
Shashi, S., Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., & Ertz, M. (2019) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2428 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Agile portfolio management: An empirical perspective on the practice in use
Stettina, C. J., & Hörz, J. (2014) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.03.008 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
“While project portfolio management originates in project management literature (Martinsuo and Lehtonen, 2007), agile project management practices as we know them today originate in the domain of software development (Dybå and Dingsøyr, 2008).”
InfluentialKupiainen, E., Mäntylä, M., & Itkonen, J. (2015) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2015.02.005 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Comparing Methods for Large-Scale Agile Software Development: A Systematic Literature Review
Edison, H., Wang, X., & Conboy, K. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2021.3069039 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
“The assessment (see Table 2) was based on the seven questions proposed by Dybå and Dingsøyr [51].”
MethodInfluentialEffort estimation in agile software development
Usman, M., Mendes, E., Neiva, F. W., & Britto, R. (2014) · doi:10.1145/2639490.2639503 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
“In addition, although there are a number of reviews that provide details on agile studies [17-21], these reviews do not aggregate the evidence in the literature from an effort estimation perspective.”
BackgroundMethodLooking beyond knowledge sharing: an integrative approach to knowledge management culture
Intezari, A. H., Taşkın, N., & Pauleen, D. J. (2017) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-06-2016-0216 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Mansoori, Y., & Lackéus, M. (2019) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-019-00153-w · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Mehta, N. A., Pandit, A., & Shukla, S. (2019) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103311 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Challenges of shared decision-making: A multiple case study of agile software development
Moe, N. B., Aurum, A., & Dybå, T. (2012) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2011.11.006 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
“This may alleviate or exacerbate development problems [11].”
Self-citationA systematic literature review on Internet of things in education: Benefits and challenges
Kassab, M., DeFranco, J. F., & Laplante, P. A. (2019) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12383 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Plastic waste as a significant threat to environment – a systematic literature review
Ilyas, M., Ahmad, W., Khan, H., Yousaf, S., Khan, K., & Nazir, S. (2018) · Reviews on Environmental Health · doi:10.1515/reveh-2017-0035 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Muduli, L., Mishra, D. P., & Jana, P. K. (2017) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2017.12.022 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Applying Machine Learning in Self-adaptive Systems
Gheibi, O., Weyns, D., & Quin, F. (2020) · ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems · doi:10.1145/3469440 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Applications of ontologies in requirements engineering: a systematic review of the literature
Dermeval, D., Vilela, J., Bittencourt, I. I., Castro, J. B., Isotani, S., Brito, P. H. S., & Silva, A. (2015) · Requirements Engineering · doi:10.1007/s00766-015-0222-6 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
A Capstone Course on Agile Software Development Using Scrum
Mahnič, V. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Education · doi:10.1109/te.2011.2142311 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
“Dybå and Dingsøyr’s systematic review of 33 empirical studies on agile software development [18] revealed that most of them investigated almost exclusively XP. Similarly, most experience in teaching the agile approach is based on the use of XP and its practices.”
BackgroundA statistical analysis of the effects of Scrum and Kanban on software development projects
Lei, H., Ganjeizadeh, F., Jayachandran, P. K., & Ozcan, P. (2015) · Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2015.12.001 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Challenges and solutions when adopting DevSecOps: A systematic review
Rajapakse, R. N., Zahedi, M., Babar, M. A., & Shen, H. (2022) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106700 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
“This is due to limitations in the search method, [43], and noncomprehensive venues or databases [64].”
BackgroundRequirements engineering for software product lines: A systematic literature review
Alves, V., Niu, N., Alves, C. F., & Valença, G. (2010) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2010.03.014 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
“Indeed, as mentioned in [25], ‘‘it is important to recognize that software engineering keywords are not standardized and that they can be both discipline – and language-specific”.”
The financial aspect of managing technical debt: A systematic literature review
Ampatzoglou, A., Ampatzoglou, A., Chatzigeorgiou, A., & Avgeriou, P. (2015) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2015.04.001 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
“In line with Dyba and Dingsoyr [10], there are three stages of filtering the article set to produce the primary study data set: 1.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCoordination in co-located agile software development projects
Strode, D. E., Huff, S. L., Hope, B. G., & Link, S. (2012) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2012.02.017 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
“More recently, prompted in part by a review of research on this topic by Dyba and Dingsoyr (2008), rigorous research methods have been used to explore how agile software development is used.”
InfluentialPetersen, K., & Wohlin, C. (2010) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-010-9136-6 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Li, S., Zhang, H., Jia, Z., Zhong, C., Zhang, C., Shan, Z., Shen, J., & Babar, M. A. (2020) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106449 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Developing theory-driven design research
Cash, P. J. (2018) · Design Studies · doi:10.1016/j.destud.2018.03.002 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Agile Methods on Large Projects in Large Organizations
Hobbs, B., & Petit, Y. (2017) · Project Management Journal · doi:10.1177/875697281704800301 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
“There has been very limited research on the topic of large-scale software development projects using agile approaches (Dyba & Dingsøyr, 2008; Razavi & Ahmad, 2014), although a number of specific cases have been investigated, for example, in the oil industry (Grewal & Maurer, 2007); in large…”
SEGRESS: Software Engineering Guidelines for REporting Secondary Studies
Kitchenham, B. A., Madeyski, L., & Budgen, D. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2022.3174092 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Survey on agile and lean usage in finnish software industry
Rodríguez, P., Markkula, J., Oivo, M., & Turula, K. (2012) · Proceedings of the ... ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement/International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement · doi:10.1145/2372251.2372275 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Large-scale agile transformation at Ericsson: a case study
Paasivaara, M., Behm, B., Lassenius, C., & Hallikainen, M. (2018) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-017-9555-8 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
“Agile methods were originally developed for small organizations, and despite success stories, large-scale application has proved challenging (Dyb˚a and Dingsøyr 2008).”
MethodRojon, C., Okupe, A., & McDowall, A. (2021) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12245 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Exploring Research in Blockchain for Healthcare and a Roadmap for the Future
Kassab, M., DeFranco, J. F., Malas, T., Laplante, P. A., Destefanis, G., & Neto, V. V. G. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing · doi:10.1109/tetc.2019.2936881 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
“For screening the relevant papers, we used a process inspired by Dybå and Dingsøyr [18] to first review the titles, keywords, abstracts and publication local of each paper and exclude those according to the exclusion criteria (75 excluded at this step).”
MethodCybersecurity awareness for children: A systematic literature review
Quayyum, F., Cruzes, D. S., & Jaccheri, L. (2021) · International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100343 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Game development software engineering process life cycle: a systematic review
Aleem, S., Capretz, L. F., & Ahmed, F. (2016) · Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development · doi:10.1186/s40411-016-0032-7 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
“To identify GDSE process life cycle domain specific characteristics, the findings of this review will be compared to re-sults from similar studies done by Cai and Card (2008), Glass et al. (2002), and Dyba and Dingsoyr (2008).”
BackgroundSix years of systematic literature reviews in software engineering: An updated tertiary study
da Silva, F. Q. B., Santos, A. L. M., Soares, S., França, A. C. C., Monteiro, C. V. F., & Maciel, F. F. (2011) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2011.04.004 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
A Systematic Literature Review on Digital Transformation
Gebayew, C., Hardini, I. R., Panjaitan, G., Kurniawan, N. B., & Suhardi (2018) · International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation · doi:10.1109/icitsi.2018.8695912 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Global software engineering and agile practices: a systematic review
Jalali, S., & Wohlin, C. (2011) · Journal of Software Evolution and Process · doi:10.1002/smr.561 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
“Dybå and Dingsøyr [10] conducted a systematic review of empirical studies of Agile software development up to 2005 resulted in identifying 36 relevant empirical studies.”
BackgroundMethodAgile Practices in Global Software Engineering - A Systematic Map
Jalali, S., & Wohlin, C. (2010) · IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE) · doi:10.1109/icgse.2010.14 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Acquiring and sharing tacit knowledge in software development teams: An empirical study
Ryan, S., & O'Connor, R. (2013) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2013.02.013 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
“A recurring theme in studies on software development and agile development in particular, is human and social factors and how these factors affect, and are affected by, agile principles [13].”
Requirements engineering: A systematic mapping study in agile software development
Curcio, K., Navarro, T., Malucelli, A., & Reinehr, S. (2018) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2018.01.036 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
“Since the agile manifesto was released a lot of research has been intensively developed to explore the agile software development ( Dybå and Dingsøyr, 2008; Diebold and Dahlem, 2014 ).”
Lenarduzzi, V., Besker, T., Taibi, D., Martini, A., & Fontana, F. A. (2020) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2020.110827 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Using CMMI together with agile software development: A systematic review
Silva, F. S., Soares, F. S. F., Peres, A. L., de Azevedo, I. M., Vasconcelos, A. P., Kamei, F., & Meira, S. R. D. L. (2014) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2014.09.012 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Understanding Self-Organizing Teams in Agile Software Development
Moe, N. B., Dingsøyr, T., & Dyb, T. (2008) · Australasian Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC) · doi:10.1109/aswec.2008.4483195 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Dybå, T., & Dingsøyr, T.
- Affiliations
- SINTEF (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Dybå, Tore
- ORCID
- Dingsøyr, Torgeir
- Venue
- Information and Software Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-08
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 9-10
- Pages
- 833-859
- ISSN
- 0950-5849 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2168811232
- Cited by
- 2,668
- References
- 105
- Citations by year
- 2026: 86 · 2025: 128 · 2024: 127 · 2023: 167 · 2022: 154 · 2021: 213 · 2020: 175 · 2019: 168 · 2018: 153 · 2017: 166 · 2016: 155 · 2015: 172 · 2014: 182 · 2013: 157 · 2012: 155
- FWCI
- 32.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Information and Software Technology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
- Keywords
- agile software development, research agenda
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
