The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web
Abstract
On behalf of the WWW2007 Program Committee, we are delighted to welcome you to WWW2007, the 16th conference in the World Wide Web conference series. The number of submissions to the refereed papers track and their quality has grown over the years. This year we had a record 755 submissions, of which we accepted 111 papers (a 14.7% acceptance rate). In response to the growing interest from the research community, we added a fourth day to the refereed papers track program, which allowed us to accept approximately 20% more papers than previous years. Despite this increase, many good papers had to be turned away. The refereed papers track consists of thirteen research areas. This year, we introduced two new tracks -- Web Services and XML and Web Data, which were formed by splitting the old "XML and Web Services" track into two new tracks. We also eliminated the "Alternate papers tracks" by folding those research areas into the regular refereed paper tracks. Thus, Technology for Developing Regions and Industrial Practice and Experience were regular refereed paper tracks this year and submissions were subjected to the same process as other tracks. We are pleased to report that both sets of changes were successful--the new tracks drew a healthy number of submissions and the quality of submissions to the new and the former alternate tracks were comparable to the other tracks. The table below summarizes the number of submissions and the number of accepted papers in each track. All papers underwent a rigorous review process by the technical program committee---each paper was reviewed by at least three reviewers, followed by an online discussion phase to reconcile conflicting opinions. Candidate accept, borderline and controversial papers were discussed at length at a two day program committee meeting, which was attended by all track and deputy chairs. Some track chairs attended the meeting via audio conferencing from a satellite California site. We are pleased with the final outcome and present to you a technical program comprising 111 papers, all of which are of the highest standard.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Exploratory Search: Beyond the Query-Response Paradigm
White, R. W., & Roth, R. A. (2009) · Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services · doi:10.2200/s00174ed1v01y200901icr003 · Cited by 632
Query expansion techniques for information retrieval: a survey
Azad, H. K., & Deepak, A. (2019) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2019.05.009 · Cited by 313
Search engine marketing is not all gold: Insights from Twitter and SEOClerks
Aswani, R., Kar, A. K., Ilavarasan, P. V., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.07.005 · Cited by 262
Willems, K., Smolders, A., Brengman, M., Luyten, K., & Schöning, J. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.066 · Cited by 207
Living a private life in public social networks: An exploration of member self-disclosure
Chen, R. (2013) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.12.003 · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2007-05-08
- OpenAlex
- W4299516513
- Cited by
- 589
- References
- 0
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1242572
- The paper
- Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web. (2007). https://doi.org/10.1145/1242572
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.