Cited by 147

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Temporal profiles of queries

Jones, Rosie, Diaz, Fernando·2007·ACM Transactions on Information Systems

Abstract

Documents with timestamps, such as email and news, can be placed along a timeline. The timeline for a set of documents returned in response to a query gives an indication of how documents relevant to that query are distributed in time. Examining the timeline of a query result set allows us to characterize both how temporally dependent the topic is, as well as how relevant the results are likely to be. We outline characteristic patterns in query result set timelines, and show experimentally that we can automatically classify documents into these classes. We also show that properties of the query result set timeline can help predict the mean average precision of a query. These results show that meta-features associated with a query can be combined with text retrieval techniques to improve our understanding and treatment of text search on documents with timestamps.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1247715.1247720

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. 10.1145/860435.860453 · DOI
  2. 10.1145/1008992.1009065 · DOI
  3. Croft W. B. and Lafferty J. 2003. Language Modeling for Information Retrieval. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Croft W. B. and Lafferty J. 2003. Language Modeling for Information Retrieval. Kluwer Academic Publishers. · DOI
  4. 10.1145/564376.564429 · DOI
  5. 10.1145/1008992.1008998 · DOI
  6. He , B. and Ounis , I . 2004. Inferring query performance using pre-retrieval predictors . In Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on String Processing and Information Retrieval (SPIRE 2004) (Padova, Italy). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, New York. He, B. and Ounis, I. 2004. Inferring query performance using pre-retrieval predictors. In Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on String Processing and Information Retrieval (SPIRE 2004) (Padova, Italy). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, New York.
  7. 10.1145/775047.775061 · DOI
  8. 10.1145/160688.160718 · DOI
  9. 10.1145/383952.383972 · DOI
  10. 10.1145/956863.956951 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.3115/1075218.1075228 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Manning C. D. and Schütze H. 1999. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. MIT Press Cambridge MA. Manning C. D. and Schütze H. 1999. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. MIT Press Cambridge MA.
  13. Quinlan , J. R. 1993. C4.5 : Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan-Kaufmann , Franciso, CA . Quinlan, J. R. 1993. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan-Kaufmann, Franciso, CA.
  14. Salton , G. 1971. The SMART Retrieval System&##8212;Experiments in Automatic Document Processing . Prentice-Hall, Inc. , Upper Saddle River, NJ. Salton, G. 1971. The SMART Retrieval System&##8212;Experiments in Automatic Document Processing. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  15. Swan , R. and Jensen , D . 2000. TimeMines: Constructing timelines with statistical models of word usage . In Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD 2000 ). ACM, New York, 73--80. Swan, R. and Jensen, D. 2000. TimeMines: Constructing timelines with statistical models of word usage. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD 2000). ACM, New York, 73--80.
  16. 10.3115/1119282.1119287 · DOI
  17. Voorhees , E. M. and Harman , D. K. , Eds . 2001 . TREC : Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval. MIT Press , Cambridge, MA. Voorhees, E. M. and Harman, D. K., Eds. 2001. TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 147

Metadata

Authors
Jones, R., & Diaz, F.
Affiliations
  • Yahoo! Research, Burbank, CA
  • University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA
Venue
ACM Transactions on Information Systems
Published
2007-07
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
14
ISSN
  • 1046-8188
  • 1558-2868
Cited by
147
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review