The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Principles of hash-based text retrieval
Abstract
Hash-based similarity search reduces a continuous similarity relation to the binary concept "similar or not similar": two feature vectors are considered as similar if they are mapped on the same hash key. From its runtime performance this principle is unequaled--while being unaffected by dimensionality concerns at the same time. Similarity hashing is applied with great success for near similarity search in large document collections, and it is considered as a key technology for near-duplicate detection and plagiarism analysis. This papers reveals the design principles behind hash-based search methods and presents them in a unified way. We introduce new stress statistics that are suited to analyze the performance of hash-based search methods, and we explain the rationale of their effectiveness. Based on these insights, we show how optimum hash functions for similarity search can be derived. We also present new results of a comparative study between different hash-based search methods.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Methods of the copying detection include algorithms that can be divided into four subcategories (Aho, 2014; Michailidis & Margaritis, 2001; Stein, 2007; Stein & Zu Eissen, 2006; Stephen, 1992).”
From Taxonomy of academic plagiarism methods (2021) · cites this paper as Stein, 2007
Citations
Cites
Approximate nearest neighbors: towards removing the curse of dimensionality
Indyk, P., & Motwani, R. (1998) · Proceedings of the thirtieth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '98 · doi:10.1145/276698.276876 · Cited by 4,188
Near Similarity Search and Plagiarism Analysis
Stein, B., & zu Eissen, S. M. (2006) · Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization · doi:10.1007/3-540-31314-1_52 · Cited by 62
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- 10.1145/383952.383981 · DOI
- 10.1145/1060745.1060840 · DOI
- Broder A., 1997, conference on World Wide Web
- 10.1145/1076034.1076039 · DOI
- 10.1145/509907.509965 · DOI
- T. Cormen C. Leiserson and R. Rivest. Introduction to Algorithms. MIT Press Cambridge. 1990. T. Cormen C. Leiserson and R. Rivest. Introduction to Algorithms. MIT Press Cambridge. 1990.
- 10.1145/997817.997857 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199009)41:6<391::AID-ASI1>3.0.CO;2-9 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02288367 · DOI
- Gionis A., 1999, The VLDB Journal
- 10.1145/1076034.1076039 · DOI
- 10.1145/1148170.1148222 · DOI
- N. Higham. Computing a Nearest Symmetric Positive Semidefinite Matrix. Linear Algebra and its App. 1988. N. Higham. Computing a Nearest Symmetric Positive Semidefinite Matrix. Linear Algebra and its App. 1988. · DOI
- Hinton G., 2006, Reducing the Dimensionality of Data with Neural Networks. Science, 313, 504
- 10.1023/A:1007617005950 · DOI
- Indyk P., 2000, Embeddings and Data Stream Computation. In FOCS'00: Proc. of the 41st symposium on foundations of computer science
- Jolliffe I., 1996, Springer
- 10.1145/258533.258653 · DOI
- J. Kruskal. Multidimensional Scaling by Optimizing Goodness of Fit to a Nonmetric Hypothesis. Psychometrika 29(1) 1964. J. Kruskal. Multidimensional Scaling by Optimizing Goodness of Fit to a Nonmetric Hypothesis. Psychometrika 29(1) 1964. · DOI
- 10.1142/S0218213004001466 · DOI
- Rose T., 2002, Proc. of the third int. conference on language resources and evaluation
- 10.1007/s10543-006-0056-1 · DOI
- Stein B., 2005, Proc. of the 5th Int. Conference on KnowledgeManagement, Graz, Journal of Universal Computer Science
- Weber R., 1998, Proc. of the 24th VLDB conference
- 10.1145/1148170.1148243 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding Plagiarism Linguistic Patterns, Textual Features, and Detection Methods
Alzahrani, S. M., Salim, N., & Abraham, A. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2011.2134847 · Cited by 299
Cross-language plagiarism detection
Potthast, M., Barrón-Cedeño, A., Stein, B., & Rosso, P. (2011) · Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.1007/s10579-009-9114-z · Cited by 286
Self-citationTaxonomy of academic plagiarism methods
Vrbanec, T., & Meštrović, A. (2021) · Zbornik Veleučilišta u Rijeci · doi:10.31784/zvr.9.1.17 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Stein, B.
- Affiliations
- Bauhaus University Weimar, Weimar, Germany
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2007-07-23
- Pages
- 527-534
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review