The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Toward trustworthy recommender systems: An analysis of attack models and algorithm robustness
Abstract
Publicly accessible adaptive systems such as collaborative recommender systems present a security problem. Attackers, who cannot be readily distinguished from ordinary users, may inject biased profiles in an attempt to force a system to “adapt” in a manner advantageous to them. Such attacks may lead to a degradation of user trust in the objectivity and accuracy of the system. Recent research has begun to examine the vulnerabilities and robustness of different collaborative recommendation techniques in the face of “profile injection” attacks. In this article, we outline some of the major issues in building secure recommender systems, concentrating in particular on the modeling of attacks and their impact on various recommendation algorithms. We introduce several new attack models and perform extensive simulation-based evaluations to show which attacks are most successful and practical against common recommendation techniques. Our study shows that both user-based and item-based algorithms are highly vulnerable to specific attack models, but that hybrid algorithms may provide a higher degree of robustness. Using our formal characterization of attack models, we also introduce a novel classification-based approach for detecting attack profiles and evaluate its effectiveness in neutralizing attacks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Himeur, Y., Sohail, S. S., Bensaali, F., Amira, A., & Alazab, M. (2022) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2022.102746 · Cited by 139
Banker, S., & Khetani, S. (2019) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1177/0743915619858057 · Cited by 120
Adversarial attacks on an oblivious recommender
Christakopoulou, K., & Banerjee, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems · doi:10.1145/3298689.3347031 · Cited by 105
Shilling Black-Box Recommender Systems by Learning to Generate Fake User Profiles
Lin, C., Chen, S., Zeng, M., Zhang, S., Gao, M., & Li, H. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2022.3183210 · Cited by 62
Data Poisoning Attack against Recommender System Using Incomplete and Perturbed Data
Zhang, H., Tian, C., Li, Y., Su, L., Yang, N., Zhao, W. X., & Gao, J. (2021) · Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3447548.3467233 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Mobasher, B., Burke, R., Bhaumik, R., & Williams, C.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Internet Technology
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 23
- ISSN
- 1533-5399 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-6051
- OpenAlex
- W1989279326
- Cited by
- 458
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 52.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward trustworthy recommender systems: An analysis of attack models and algorithm robustness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1278366.1278372
- The paper
- Mobasher, B., Burke, R., Bhaumik, R., & Williams, C. (2007). Toward trustworthy recommender systems: An analysis of attack models and algorithm robustness. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology. https://doi.org/10.1145/1278366.1278372
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.