The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mining specifications of malicious behavior
Abstract
Malware detectors require a specification of malicious behavior. Typically, these specifications are manually constructed by investigating known malware. We present an automatic technique to overcome this laborious manual process. Our technique derives such a specification by comparing the execution behavior of a known malware against the execution behaviors of a set of benign programs. In other words, we mine the malicious behavior present in a known malware that is not present in a set of benign programs. The output of our algorithm can be used by malware detectors to detect malware variants. Since our algorithm provides a succinct description of malicious behavior present in a malware, it can also be used by security analysts for understanding the malware. We have implemented a prototype based on our algorithm and tested it on several malware programs. Experimental results obtained from our prototype indicate that our algorithm is effective in extracting malicious behaviors that can be used to detect malware variants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Crowdroid: behavior-based malware detection system for Android
Burguera, I., Zurutuza, U., & Nadjm-Tehrani, S. (2011) · Proceedings of the 1st ACM workshop on Security and privacy in smartphones and mobile devices · doi:10.1145/2046614.2046619 · Cited by 910
A survey on automated dynamic malware-analysis techniques and tools
Egele, M., Scholte, T., Kirda, E., & Kruegel, C. (2012) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2089125.2089126 · Cited by 871
Self-citationA Survey on Malware Detection Using Data Mining Techniques
Ye, Y., Li, T., Adjeroh, D., & Iyengar, S. S. (2018) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3073559 · Cited by 623
On the feasibility of online malware detection with performance counters
Demme, J., Maycock, M., Schmitz, J., Tang, A., Waksman, A., Sethumadhavan, S., & Stolfo, S. (2013) · Proceedings of the 40th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture · doi:10.1145/2485922.2485970 · Cited by 334
Behavior based software theft detection
Wang, X., Jhi, Y.-C., Zhu, S., & Liu, P. (2009) · Proceedings of the 16th ACM conference on Computer and communications security · doi:10.1145/1653662.1653696 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Christodorescu, M., Jha, S., & Kruegel, C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the the 6th joint meeting of the European software engineering conference and the ACM SIGSOFT symposium on The foundations of software engineering
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2007-09-07
- Pages
- 5-14
- OpenAlex
- W2167671111
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.46
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mining specifications of malicious behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1287624.1287628
- The paper
- Christodorescu, M., Jha, S., & Kruegel, C. (2007). Mining specifications of malicious behavior. Proceedings of the the 6th joint meeting of the European software engineering conference and the ACM SIGSOFT symposium on The foundations of software engineering. https://doi.org/10.1145/1287624.1287628
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.