Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 852

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Youtube traffic characterization: a view from the edge

Gill, Phillipa, Arlitt, Martin, Li, Zongpeng, Mahanti, Anirban·2007·Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement

Abstract

This paper presents a traffic characterization study of the popular video sharing service, YouTube. Over a three month period we observed almost 25 million transactions between users on an edge network and YouTube, including more than 600,000 video downloads. We also monitored the globally popular videos over this period of time.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1298306.1298310

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 852

Metadata

Authors
Gill, P., Arlitt, M., Li, Z., & Mahanti, A.
Venue
Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement
Publisher
ACM
Published
2007-10-24
Pages
15-28
OpenAlex
W1986697120
Cited by
852
References
17
FWCI
29.71
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Youtube traffic characterization: a view from the edge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1298306.1298310
The paper
Gill, P., Arlitt, M., Li, Z., & Mahanti, A. (2007). Youtube traffic characterization: a view from the edge. Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement. https://doi.org/10.1145/1298306.1298310

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.