The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Network monitoring using traffic dispersion graphs (tdgs)
Abstract
Monitoring network traffic and detecting unwanted applications has become a challenging problem, since many applications obfuscate their traffic using unregistered port numbers or payload encryption. Apart from some notable exceptions, most traffic monitoring tools use two types of approaches: (a) keeping traffic statistics such as packet sizes and interarrivals, flow counts, byte volumes, etc., or (b) analyzing packet content. In this paper, we propose the use of Traffic Dispersion Graphs (TDGs) as a way to monitor, analyze, and visualize network traffic. TDGs model the social behavior of hosts ("who talks to whom"), where the edges can be defined to represent different interactions (e.g. the exchange of a certain number or type of packets). With the introduction of TDGs, we are able to harness a wealth of tools and graph modeling techniques from a diverse set of disciplines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SybilGuard: defending against sybil attacks via social networks
Yu, H., Kaminsky, M., Gibbons, P. B., & Flaxman, A. (2006) · Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications · doi:10.1145/1159913.1159945 · Cited by 260
Unexpected means of protocol inference
Ma, J., Levchenko, K., Kreibich, C., Savage, S., & Voelker, G. M. (2006) · Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement · doi:10.1145/1177080.1177123 · Cited by 204
Cited by
Graph based anomaly detection and description: a survey
Akoglu, L., Tong, H., & Koutra, D. (2015) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-014-0365-y · Cited by 1,504
Internet traffic classification demystified: myths, caveats, and the best practices
Kim, H., Claffy, K., Fomenkov, M., Barman, D., Faloutsos, M., & Lee, K. (2008) · Proceedings of the 2008 ACM CoNEXT Conference on - CONEXT '08 · doi:10.1145/1544012.1544023 · Cited by 485
Self-citationSilva, S. S. C., Silva, R. M. P., Pinto, R. C. G., & Salles, R. M. (2013) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2012.07.021 · Cited by 356
Graph summarization with bounded error
Navlakha, S., Rastogi, R., & Shrivastava, N. (2008) · Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data · doi:10.1145/1376616.1376661 · Cited by 347
Digging into HTTPS: flow-based classification of webmail traffic
Schatzmann, D., Mühlbauer, W., Spyropoulos, T., & Dimitropoulos, X. (2010) · Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement · doi:10.1145/1879141.1879184 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Iliofotou, M., Pappu, P., Faloutsos, M., Mitzenmacher, M., Singh, S., & Varghese, G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2007-10-24
- Pages
- 315-320
- OpenAlex
- W2119895316
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.94
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Network monitoring using traffic dispersion graphs (tdgs). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1298306.1298349
- The paper
- Iliofotou, M., Pappu, P., Faloutsos, M., Mitzenmacher, M., Singh, S., & Varghese, G. (2007). Network monitoring using traffic dispersion graphs (tdgs). Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement. https://doi.org/10.1145/1298306.1298349
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
