The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A comparison of statistical significance tests for information retrieval evaluation
Open accessAbstract
Information retrieval (IR) researchers commonly use three tests of statistical significance: the Student's paired t-test, the Wilcoxon signed rank test, and the sign test. Other researchers have previously proposed using both the bootstrap and Fisher's randomization (permutation) test as non-parametric significance tests for IR but these tests have seen little use. For each of these five tests, we took the ad-hoc retrieval runs submitted to TRECs 3 and 5-8, and for each pair of runs, we measured the statistical significance of the difference in their mean average precision. We discovered that there is little practical difference between the randomization, bootstrap, and t tests. Both the Wilcoxon and sign test have a poor ability to detect significance and have the potential to lead to false detections of significance. The Wilcoxon and sign tests are simplified variants of the randomization test and their use should be discontinued for measuring the significance of a difference between means.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
Wilcoxon, F. (1945) · Biometrics Bulletin · doi:10.2307/3001968 · Cited by 15,354
Fisher, R. A. (1936) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.1.3923.554-a · Cited by 4,980
Edgington, E., Edgington, E., & Onghena, P. (2007) · doi:10.1201/9781420011814 · Cited by 2,030
Cited by
Framing Image Description as a Ranking Task: Data, Models and Evaluation Metrics
Hodosh, M., Young, P., & Hockenmaier, J. (2013) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.3994 · Cited by 1,314
Test Collection Based Evaluation of Information Retrieval Systems
Sanderson, M. (2010) · Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1561/1500000009 · Cited by 485
Towards Conversational Search and Recommendation: System Ask, User Respond
Zhang, Y., Chen, X., Ai, Q., Yang, L., & Croft, W. B. (2018) · Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3269206.3271776 · Cited by 319
LSDA: Large Scale Detection Through Adaptation
Hoffman, J., Guadarrama, S., Tzeng, E., Hu, R., Donahue, J., Girshick, R., Darrell, T., & Saenko, K. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1407.5035 · Cited by 284
Improving automated source code summarization via an eye-tracking study of programmers
Rodeghero, P., McMillan, C., McBurney, P. W., Bosch, N., & D'Mello, S. (2014) · Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/2568225.2568247 · Cited by 198
Metadata
- Authors
- Smucker, M. D., Allan, J., & Carterette, B.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the sixteenth ACM conference on Conference on information and knowledge management
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2007-11-06
- Pages
- 623-632
- OpenAlex
- W1990190154
- Cited by
- 718
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.09
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison of statistical significance tests for information retrieval evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1321440.1321528
- The paper
- Smucker, M. D., Allan, J., & Carterette, B. (2007). A comparison of statistical significance tests for information retrieval evaluation. Proceedings of the sixteenth ACM conference on Conference on information and knowledge management. https://doi.org/10.1145/1321440.1321528
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
