Towards Conversational Search and Recommendation: System Ask, User Respond
Open accessAbstract
Conversational search and recommendation based on user-system dialogs exhibit major differences from conventional search and recommendation tasks in that 1) the user and system can interact for multiple semantically coherent rounds on a task through natural language dialog, and 2) it becomes possible for the system to understand the user needs or to help users clarify their needs by asking appropriate questions from the users directly. We believe the ability to ask questions so as to actively clarify the user needs is one of the most important advantages of conversational search and recommendation. In this paper, we propose and evaluate a unified conversational search/recommendation framework, in an attempt to make the research problem doable under a standard formalization. Specifically, we propose a System Ask -- User Respond (SAUR) paradigm for conversational search, define the major components of the paradigm, and design a unified implementation of the framework for product search and recommendation in e-commerce. To accomplish this, we propose the Multi-Memory Network (MMN) architecture, which can be trained based on large-scale collections of user reviews in e-commerce. The system is capable of asking aspect-based questions in the right order so as to understand the user needs, while (personalized) search is conducted during the conversation, and results are provided when the system feels confident. Experiments on real-world user purchasing data verified the advantages of conversational search and recommendation against conventional search and recommendation algorithms in terms of standard evaluation measures such as NDCG.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Large language models, especially chat models from instruction tuning, are foundational building blocks for many personalization services, such as conversational search and recommendation.
“Thanks to the superior capabilities of understanding, reasoning, and generating, large language models, especially the chat models produced by instruction tuning, are presented as foundamental building blocks for many personalization services. One direct scenario is the conversational search and recommendation [40].”
From When large language models meet personalization: perspectives of challenges and opportunities (2024) · cites this paper as [40]
Cites
Large-scale Simple Question Answering with Memory Networks
Bordes, A., Usunier, N., Chopra, S., & Weston, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.02075 · Cited by 528 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Geng, S., Liu, S., Fu, Z., Ge, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2022) · Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems · doi:10.1145/3523227.3546767 · Cited by 556 · see citing works
Self-citationWhen large language models meet personalization: perspectives of challenges and opportunities
Chen, J., Liu, Z., Huang, X., Wu, C., Liu, Q., Jiang, G., Pu, Y., Lei, Y., Chen, X., Wang, X., et al. (2024) · World Wide Web · doi:10.1007/s11280-024-01276-1 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
“One direct scenario is the conversational search and recommendation [40].”
Self-citationTowards Human-Centered Explainable AI: A Survey of User Studies for Model Explanations
Rong, Y., Leemann, T., Nguyen, T.-T., Fiedler, L., Qian, P., Unhelkar, V., Seidel, T., Kasneci, G., & Kasneci, E. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2023.3331846 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Personalized Prompt Learning for Explainable Recommendation
Li, L., Zhang, Y., & Chen, L. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3580488 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Self-citationPersonalized Transformer for Explainable Recommendation
Li, L., Zhang, Y., & Chen, L. (2021) · Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.383 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Self-citationGenerative Echo Chamber? Effect of LLM-Powered Search Systems on Diverse Information Seeking
Sharma, N., Liao, Q. V., & Xiao, Z. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642459 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Conversational AI over Military Scenarios Using Intent Detection and Response Generation
Chuang, H.-M., & Cheng, D.-W. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12052494 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhang, Y., Chen, X., Ai, Q., Yang, L., & Croft, W. B.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2018-10-17
- Pages
- 177-186
- ISSN
- 2155-0751 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2898076813
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 28.06
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (IIS-1715095)
- Center for Intelligent Information Retrieval
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Keywords
- conversational search, conversational recommendation, personalized search, e-commerce product search, online reviews
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review