Cited by 319Recommender Systems and TechniquesInformation Retrieval and Search BehaviorSpeech and dialogue systems

Towards Conversational Search and Recommendation: System Ask, User Respond

Open access
Zhang, Yongfeng, Chen, Xu, Ai, Qingyao, Yang, Liu, Croft, W. Bruce·2018·Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management

Abstract

Conversational search and recommendation based on user-system dialogs exhibit major differences from conventional search and recommendation tasks in that 1) the user and system can interact for multiple semantically coherent rounds on a task through natural language dialog, and 2) it becomes possible for the system to understand the user needs or to help users clarify their needs by asking appropriate questions from the users directly. We believe the ability to ask questions so as to actively clarify the user needs is one of the most important advantages of conversational search and recommendation. In this paper, we propose and evaluate a unified conversational search/recommendation framework, in an attempt to make the research problem doable under a standard formalization. Specifically, we propose a System Ask -- User Respond (SAUR) paradigm for conversational search, define the major components of the paradigm, and design a unified implementation of the framework for product search and recommendation in e-commerce. To accomplish this, we propose the Multi-Memory Network (MMN) architecture, which can be trained based on large-scale collections of user reviews in e-commerce. The system is capable of asking aspect-based questions in the right order so as to understand the user needs, while (personalized) search is conducted during the conversation, and results are provided when the system feels confident. Experiments on real-world user purchasing data verified the advantages of conversational search and recommendation against conventional search and recommendation algorithms in terms of standard evaluation measures such as NDCG.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3269206.3271776

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Large language models, especially chat models from instruction tuning, are foundational building blocks for many personalization services, such as conversational search and recommendation.

    “Thanks to the superior capabilities of understanding, reasoning, and generating, large language models, especially the chat models produced by instruction tuning, are presented as foundamental building blocks for many personalization services. One direct scenario is the conversational search and recommendation [40].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Y., Chen, X., Ai, Q., Yang, L., & Croft, W. B.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
Publisher
ACM
Published
2018-10-17
Pages
177-186
ISSN
2155-0751 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2898076813
Cited by
319
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 1
FWCI
28.06
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (IIS-1715095)
  • Center for Intelligent Information Retrieval
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
Keywords
conversational search, conversational recommendation, personalized search, e-commerce product search, online reviews

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review