The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling bug report quality
Abstract
Software developers spend a significant portion of their resources handling user-submitted bug reports. For software that is widely deployed, the number of bug reports typically outstrips the resources available to triage them. As a result, some reports may be dealt with too slowly or not at all.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection
Kohavi, R. (1995) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.19712698 · Cited by 10,909
Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval
Salton, G., & McGill, M. J. (1983) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 9,680
The cathedral and the bazaar: musings on Linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-2841 · Cited by 2,251
Anvik, J., Hiew, L., & Murphy, G. C. (2006) · Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering · doi:10.1145/1134285.1134336 · Cited by 924
Top 10 list [software development]
Boehm, B., & Basili, V. R. (2001) · Computer · doi:10.1109/2.962984 · Cited by 814
Bug isolation via remote program sampling
Liblit, B., Aiken, A., Zheng, A. X., & Jordan, M. I. (2003) · ACM SIGPLAN Notices · doi:10.1145/780822.781148 · Cited by 504
How Long Will It Take to Fix This Bug?
Weiss, C., Premraj, R., Zimmermann, T., & Zeller, A. (2007) · Fourth International Workshop on Mining Software Repositories (MSR'07:ICSE Workshops 2007) · doi:10.1109/msr.2007.13 · Cited by 375
Distributional word clusters vs. words for text categorization
Bekkerman, R., El‐Yaniv, R., Tishby, N., & Winter, Y. (2003) · doi:10.5555/944919.944969 · Cited by 279
Coping with an open bug repository
Anvik, J., Hiew, L., & Murphy, G. C. (2005) · Proceedings of the 2005 OOPSLA workshop on Eclipse technology eXchange - eclipse '05 · doi:10.1145/1117696.1117704 · Cited by 252
Bug isolation via remote program sampling
Liblit, B., Aiken, A., Zheng, A. X., & Jordan, M. I. (2003) · Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 2003 conference on Programming language design and implementation · doi:10.1145/781131.781148 · Cited by 241
Cited by
Improving bug triage with bug tossing graphs
Jeong, G., Kim, S., & Zimmermann, T. (2009) · Proceedings of the 7th joint meeting of the European software engineering conference and the ACM SIGSOFT symposium on The foundations of software engineering · doi:10.1145/1595696.1595715 · Cited by 455
Towards more accurate retrieval of duplicate bug reports
Sun, C., Lo, D., Khoo, S.-C., & Jiang, J. (2011) · 2011 26th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2011) · doi:10.1109/ase.2011.6100061 · Cited by 334
It's not a bug, it's a feature: How misclassification impacts bug prediction
Herzig, K., Just, S., & Zeller, A. (2013) · 2013 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) · doi:10.1109/icse.2013.6606585 · Cited by 294
The Influence of the Task on Programmer Behaviour
Ying, A. T. T., & Robillard, M. P. (2011) · 2011 IEEE 19th International Conference on Program Comprehension · doi:10.1109/icpc.2011.35 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Hooimeijer, P., & Weimer, W.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the twenty-second IEEE/ACM international conference on Automated software engineering
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2007-11-05
- Pages
- 34-43
- OpenAlex
- W2127577307
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 7.76
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling bug report quality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1321631.1321639
- The paper
- Hooimeijer, P., & Weimer, W. (2007). Modeling bug report quality. Proceedings of the twenty-second IEEE/ACM international conference on Automated software engineering. https://doi.org/10.1145/1321631.1321639
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
