The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Confidence-based policy learning from demonstration using Gaussian mixture models
Abstract
We contribute an approach for interactive policy learning through expert demonstration that allows an agent to actively request and effectively represent demonstration examples. In order to address the inherent uncertainty of human demonstration, we represent the policy as a set of Gaussian mixture models (GMMs), where each model, with multiple Gaussian components, corresponds to a single action. Incrementally received demonstration examples are used as training data for the GMM set. We then introduce our confident execution approach, which focuses learning on relevant parts of the domain by enabling the agent to identify the need for and request demonstrations for specific parts of the state space. The agent selects between demonstration and autonomous execution based on statistical analysis of the uncertainty of the learned Gaussian mixture set. As it achieves proficiency at its task and gains confidence in its actions, the agent operates with increasing autonomy, eliminating the need for unnecessary demonstrations of already acquired behavior, and reducing both the training time and the demonstration workload of the expert. We validate our approach with experiments in simulated and real robot domains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A survey of robot learning from demonstration
Argall, B. D., Chernova, S., Veloso, M., & Browning, B. (2009) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2008.10.024 · Cited by 3,227
Self-citationImitation Learning: A Survey of Learning Methods
Hussein, A., Gaber, M. M., Elyan, E., & Jayne, C. (2018) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3054912 · Cited by 1,060
PRIMAL: Pathfinding via Reinforcement and Imitation Multi-Agent Learning
Sartoretti, G., Kerr, J., Shi, Y., Wagner, G., Kumar, T. K. S., Koenig, S., & Choset, H. (2019) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2019.2903261 · Cited by 417
DeepMPC: Learning Deep Latent Features for Model Predictive Control
Lenz, I., Knepper, R., & Saxena, A. (2015) · Robotics: Science and Systems XI · doi:10.15607/rss.2015.xi.012 · Cited by 332
A Survey on Transfer Learning for Multiagent Reinforcement Learning Systems
Silva, F. L. D., & Costa, A. H. R. (2019) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.11396 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Chernova, S., & Veloso, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2007-05-14
- Pages
- 1-8
- ISSN
- 1548-8403 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1971890413
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.72
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Confidence-based policy learning from demonstration using Gaussian mixture models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1329125.1329407
- The paper
- Chernova, S., & Veloso, M. (2007). Confidence-based policy learning from demonstration using Gaussian mixture models. Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/1329125.1329407
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.