The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Re-tiling polygonal surfaces
Abstract
This paper presents an automatic method of creating surface models at several levels of detail from an original polygonal description of a given object. Representing models at various levels of detail is important for achieving high frame rates in interactive graphics applications and also for speeding-up the off-line rendering of complex scenes. Unfortunately, generating these levels of detail is a time-consuming task usually left to a human modeler. This paper shows how a new set of vertices can be distributed over the surface of a model and connected to one another to create a re-tiling of a surface that is faithful to both the geometry and the topology of the original surface. Themain contributions of this paper are: 1) a robust method of connecting together new vertices over a surface, 2) a way of using an estimate of surface curvature to distribute more new vertices at regions of higher curvature and 3) a method of smoothly interpolating between models that represent the same object at different levels of detail. The key notion in the re-tiling procedure is the creation of an intermediate model called the mutual tessellation of a surface that contains both the vertices from the original model and the new points that are to become vertices in the re-tiled surface. The new model is then created by removing each original vertex and locally re-triangulating the surface in a way that matches the local connectedness of the initial surface. This technique for surface retessellation has been successfully applied to iso-surface models derived from volume data, Connolly surface molecular models and a tessellation of a minimal surface of interest to mathematicians. CRCategoriesandSubjectDescriptors: I.3.3 [ComputerGraph- ics]: Picture/Image Generation -- Display algorithms
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Multiresolution analysis for surfaces of arbitrary topological type
Lounsbery, M., DeRose, T. D., & Warren, J. (1997) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/237748.237750 · Cited by 760
Multi-resolution 3D approximations for rendering complex scenes
Rossignac, J., & Borrel, P. (1993) · Modeling in Computer Graphics · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-78114-8_29 · Cited by 721
View-dependent simplification of arbitrary polygonal environments
Luebke, D., & Erikson, C. (1997) · Proceedings of the 24th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques - SIGGRAPH '97 · doi:10.1145/258734.258847 · Cited by 508
Schreiner, J., Asirvatham, A., Praun, E., & Hoppe, H. (2004) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/1015706.1015812 · Cited by 265
Topology simplification for polygonal virtual environments
El-Sana, J., & Varshney, A. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/2945.694955 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Turk, G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 19th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 1992-07
- Pages
- 55-64
- OpenAlex
- W2133493855
- Cited by
- 738
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.63
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Re-tiling polygonal surfaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/133994.134008
- The paper
- Turk, G. (1992). Re-tiling polygonal surfaces. Proceedings of the 19th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. https://doi.org/10.1145/133994.134008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.