The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities
Abstract
Microblogging is a new form of communication in which users can describe their current status in short posts distributed by instant messages, mobile phones, email or the Web. Twitter, a popular microblogging tool has seen a lot of growth since it launched in October, 2006. In this paper, we present our observations of the microblogging phenomena by studying the topological and geographical properties of Twitter's social network. We find that people use microblogging to talk about their daily activities and to seek or share information. Finally, we analyze the user intentions associated at a community level and show how users with similar intentions connect with each other.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Austin, J. L. (1975) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 · Cited by 21,496
Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society
Palla, G., Derényi, I., Farkas, I., & Vicsek, T. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03607 · Cited by 5,373
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- J. Allen . Recognizing intentions from natural language utterances . Computational Models of Discourse , pages 107 -- 166 , 1983 . J. Allen. Recognizing intentions from natural language utterances. Computational Models of Discourse, pages 107--166, 1983.
- Blogpulse. The 3rd annual workshop on weblogging ecosystem: Aggregation, analysis and dynamics, 15th world wide web conference , May 2006 . Blogpulse. The 3rd annual workshop on weblogging ecosystem: Aggregation, analysis and dynamics, 15th world wide web conference, May 2006.
- 10.1145/792550.792552 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5555/347319.346290 · doi:10.5555/347319.346290
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.066111 · DOI · Paper page
- A. Clauset , C. R. Shalizi , and M. E. J. Newman . Power-law distributions in empirical data , Jun 2007 . A. Clauset, C. R. Shalizi, and M. E. J. Newman. Power-law distributions in empirical data, Jun 2007.
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.160202 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1140/epjb/e2004-00056-6 · DOI
- 10.1109/2.989932 · DOI · Paper page
- M. Girvan and M. E. J. Newman . Community structure in social and biological networks , Dec 2001 . M. Girvan and M. E. J. Newman. Community structure in social and biological networks, Dec 2001.
- 10.2307/2184179 · DOI · Paper page
- B. J. Grosz . Focusing and Description in Natural Language Dialogues . Cambridge University Press , New York , New York, 1981 . B. J. Grosz. Focusing and Description in Natural Language Dialogues. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, 1981.
- 10.1145/324133.324140 · DOI · Paper page
- P. Kolari , T. Finin , Y. Yesha , Y. Yesha , K. Lyons , S. Perelgut , and J. Hawkins . On the Structure , Properties and Utility of Internal Corporate Blogs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2007) , March 2007 . P. Kolari, T. Finin, Y. Yesha, Y. Yesha, K. Lyons, S. Perelgut, and J. Hawkins. On the Structure, Properties and Utility of Internal Corporate Blogs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2007) , March 2007.
- 10.1016/S1389-1286(99)00040-7 · DOI · Paper page
- A. Lavallee . Friends swap twitters, and frustration - new real-time messaging services overwhelm some users with mundane updates from friends , March 16 , 2007 . A. Lavallee. Friends swap twitters, and frustration - new real-time messaging services overwhelm some users with mundane updates from friends, March 16, 2007.
- T. Lento , H. T. Welser , L. Gu , and M. Smith . The ties that blog: Examining the relationship between social ties and continued participation in the wallop weblogging system , 2006 . T. Lento, H. T. Welser, L. Gu, and M. Smith. The ties that blog: Examining the relationship between social ties and continued participation in the wallop weblogging system, 2006.
- 10.1073/pnas.0503018102 · DOI · Paper page
- Y.-R. Lin , H. Sundaram , Y. Chi , J. Tatemura , and B. Tseng . Discovery of Blog Communities based on Mutual Awareness . In Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Workshop on Weblogging Ecosystem: Aggregation, Analysis and Dynamics, 15th World Wide Web Conference , May 2006 . Y.-R. Lin, H. Sundaram, Y. Chi, J. Tatemura, and B. Tseng. Discovery of Blog Communities based on Mutual Awareness. In Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Workshop on Weblogging Ecosystem: Aggregation, Analysis and Dynamics, 15th World Wide Web Conference, May 2006.
- 10.3115/1072228.1072335 · doi:10.3115/1072228.1072335
- 10.1145/1183614.1183678 · DOI
- 10.1145/1035134.1035163 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00107510500052444 · DOI
- J. Pontin . From many tweets, one loud voice on the internet . The New York Times , April 22, 2007 . J. Pontin. From many tweets, one loud voice on the internet. The New York Times, April 22, 2007.
- 10.3115/1117729.1117730 · DOI · Paper page
- X. Shi , B. Tseng , and L. A. Adamic . Looking at the blogosphere topology through different lenses . In Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2007) , March 2007 . X. Shi, B. Tseng, and L. A. Adamic. Looking at the blogosphere topology through different lenses. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2007) , March 2007.
- 10.2307/2183301 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/30918 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?
Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010) · Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web · doi:10.1145/1772690.1772751 · Cited by 6,652
Holme, P., & Saramäki, J. (2012) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.03.001 · Cited by 2,736
“Typically, people have studied spreading events in blogs [1, 84] or microblogs (like Twitter) [66, 87].”
BackgroundInformation credibility on twitter
Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., & Poblete, B. (2011) · Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web · doi:10.1145/1963405.1963500 · Cited by 2,593
Predicting the future with social media
Asur, S., & Huberman, B. A. (2010) · 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology · doi:10.1109/wi-iat.2010.63 · Cited by 2,081
Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter
Boyd, D., Golder, S., & Lotan, G. (2010) · 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.1109/hicss.2010.412 · Cited by 2,051
Metadata
- Authors
- Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., & Tseng, B.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2007-08-12
- Pages
- 56-65
- OpenAlex
- W2046804949
- Cited by
- 2,645
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 103.36
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.