Cited by 175Innovative Human-Technology InteractionNostalgia and Consumer BehaviorMemory, Trauma, and Commemoration

AutoTopography: what can physical mementos tell us about digital memories?

Open access
Petrelli, Daniela, Whittaker, Steve, Brockmeier, Jens·2008·Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

Current technology makes it possible to capture huge amounts of information related to everyday experiences. Despite this, we know little about the processes by which people identify and manage mementos - objects which are directly meaningful to their memories. Among the millions of objects people encounter in a lifetime, few become such reminders of people, places or events. We report fieldwork where participants gave us a tour of their homes describing how and why particular objects become mementos. Our findings extend the existing digital memory literature; first our participants didn't view their activities as experiential 'capture', nor were mementos limited to pictorial representations of people and events; instead they included everyday objects. Furthermore, mementos were not only displayed and shared, but also integrated into everyday activities. Finally there were complex relations between house location and memento type. We discuss the theoretical and technical implications of our work.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1357054.1357065

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Everyday objects become mementos by virtue of what the owner has invested in them, be it time or emotion; it is not usually the physical characteristics of objects that make them biographical, but the meaning imputed to them as significant personal possessions.

    “'Everyday objects become mementos by virtue of what the owner has invested in them, be it time or emotion. Thus, it is not usually the physical characteristics of the objects that make them biographical, but the meaning imputed to them as significant perso nal possessions' (Petrelli et al 2008: 56).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Bechelard, G. (1994) The poetics of space, Beacon Press.
  2. Brown, N. On the prevalence of event clusters in autobiographical memory. Social Cognition, 2005, 23 (1), 35-69.
  3. Chaften, R. (1987) Snapshots Versions of Life. 1987. Popular Press.
  4. Crabtree,A., Rodden,T. Mariani,J. (2004) Collaborating around collections: informing the continued development of photoware, Proc. CSCW, 396-405.
  5. Csikszentmihalyi, M. and Rochberg-Halton, E. (1981) The meaning of things -Domestic symbols and the self. Cambridge University Press.
  6. Dalsgaard, T., Skov, M., Stougaard, M. and Thomassen, B. (2006) Mediated Intimacy in Families: Understanding the relation between children and Parents. Proceedings of the conference Interaction Design and Children -IDC'06, 145-152
  7. Fivush, R. and Nelson, K. (2004) Culture and Language in the Emergence of Autobiographical Memory, Psychological Science, 15 (9), 573-577
  8. Frohlich, D., Fennell, J. (2007) Sound, paper and memorabilia: resources for a simpler digital photography. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, vol. 11, 107-116.
  9. Frohlich, D. (2004) Audiophotography: Bringing photos to life with sounds, Springer.
  10. Gonzalez, J. (1995) Autotopographies. In Brahm, G. and Driscoll, M. (eds.) Prosthetic Territories -Politics and Hypertechnologies. 133-150, Westview Press.
  11. Hoskins, J. (1998) Biographical objects -how things tell the stories of people's lives. Routledge.
  12. Hutchinson, H., Roussel, N., Mackay, W., Bederson, B., Durin, A., Plaisant, C. et al. (2003) Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families. CHI 2003, 17-24.
  13. Kopytoff, I. (1986) The cultural biography of things: commoditization as a process. In Appadurai, A. (ed.) The social life of things -commoditization and cultural perspective, Cambridge University Press.
  14. Leichtman, M. and Wang, Q. (2005) Autobiographical memory in the developmental niche: A cross-cultural perspective, in Homer, B. & Tamis-LeMonda (eds.) The development of social cognition and communication.
  15. Mann, S. (2004) Continuous lifelog capture of personal experience with EyeTap. Proc. of CARPE.
  16. Turkle, S. (2007) Evocative Objects -Things we think with, MIT Press.
  17. Van den Hoven, E. (2004) Graspable Cues for Everyday Recollecting. PhD thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
  18. Wang, Q. and Brockmeier, J. (2002) Autobiographical remembering as cultural practice: Understanding the interplay between memory, self and culture, Culture Psychology, 8 (45), 45-64

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Petrelli, D., Whittaker, S., & Brockmeier, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • Universität Innsbruck (AT)
Venue
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2008-04-06
Pages
53-62
OpenAlex
W2102452277
Cited by
175
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 18
FWCI
9.53
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Nostalgia and Consumer Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
Keywords
Memento, personal memories, everyday objects, family environment, digital memory, memory management, object memory, home tours

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review