The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A practical automatic polyhedral parallelizer and locality optimizer
Abstract
We present the design and implementation of an automatic polyhedral source-to-source transformation framework that can optimize regular programs (sequences of possibly imperfectly nested loops) for parallelism and locality simultaneously. Through this work, we show the practicality of analytical model-driven automatic transformation in the polyhedral model -- far beyond what is possible by current production compilers. Unlike previous works, our approach is an end-to-end fully automatic one driven by an integer linear optimization framework that takes an explicit view of finding good ways of tiling for parallelism and locality using affine transformations. The framework has been implemented into a tool to automatically generate OpenMP parallel code from C program sections. Experimental results from the tool show very high speedups for local and parallel execution on multi-cores over state-of-the-art compiler frameworks from the research community as well as the best native production compilers. The system also enables the easy use of powerful empirical/iterative optimization for general arbitrarily nested loop sequences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Automated empirical optimizations of software and the ATLAS project
Clint Whaley, R., Petitet, A., & Dongarra, J. J. (2001) · Parallel Computing · doi:10.1016/s0167-8191(00)00087-9 · Cited by 1,317
Code generation in the polyhedral model is easier than you think
Bastoul, C. (2004) · Proceedings. 13th International Conference on Parallel Architecture and Compilation Techniques, 2004. PACT 2004. · doi:10.1109/pact.2004.1342537 · Cited by 447
Blocking and array contraction across arbitrarily nested loops using affine partitioning
Lim, A. W., Liao, S.-W., & Lam, M. S. (2001) · Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGPLAN symposium on Principles and practices of parallel programming · doi:10.1145/379539.379586 · Cited by 142
Implicit and explicit optimizations for stencil computations
Kamil, S., Datta, K., Williams, S., Oliker, L., Shalf, J., & Yelick, K. (2006) · Proceedings of the 2006 workshop on Memory system performance and correctness · doi:10.1145/1178597.1178605 · Cited by 130
Cited by
POLLY — PERFORMING POLYHEDRAL OPTIMIZATIONS ON A LOW-LEVEL INTERMEDIATE REPRESENTATION
GROSSER, T., GROESSLINGER, A., & LENGAUER, C. (2012) · Parallel Processing Letters · doi:10.1142/s0129626412500107 · Cited by 355
An auto-tuning framework for parallel multicore stencil computations
Kamil, S., Chan, C., Oliker, L., Shalf, J., & Williams, S. (2010) · 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel & Distributed Processing (IPDPS) · doi:10.1109/ipdps.2010.5470421 · Cited by 209
Metadata
- Authors
- Bondhugula, U., Hartono, A., Ramanujam, J., & Sadayappan, P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2008-06-07
- Pages
- 101-113
- ISSN
- 1531-7102 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2034761517
- Cited by
- 880
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 18.30
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A practical automatic polyhedral parallelizer and locality optimizer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1375581.1375595
- The paper
- Bondhugula, U., Hartono, A., Ramanujam, J., & Sadayappan, P. (2008). A practical automatic polyhedral parallelizer and locality optimizer. Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation. https://doi.org/10.1145/1375581.1375595
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.