Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 408

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Joint latent topic models for text and citations

Nallapati, Ramesh M., Ahmed, Amr, Xing, Eric P., Cohen, William W.·2008·Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining

Abstract

In this work, we address the problem of joint modeling of text and citations in the topic modeling framework. We present two different models called the Pairwise-Link-LDA and the Link-PLSA-LDA models.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1401890.1401957

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 408

Metadata

Authors
Nallapati, R. M., Ahmed, A., Xing, E. P., & Cohen, W. W.
Venue
Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
Publisher
ACM
Published
2008-08-24
Pages
542-550
OpenAlex
W2165636119
Cited by
408
References
0
FWCI
14.39
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Joint latent topic models for text and citations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1401890.1401957
The paper
Nallapati, R. M., Ahmed, A., Xing, E. P., & Cohen, W. W. (2008). Joint latent topic models for text and citations. Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. https://doi.org/10.1145/1401890.1401957

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.