The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effective community search for large attributed graphs
Abstract
Given a graph G and a vertex q ∈ G , the community search query returns a subgraph of G that contains vertices related to q . Communities, which are prevalent in attributed graphs such as social networks and knowledge bases, can be used in emerging applications such as product advertisement and setting up of social events. In this paper, we investigate the attributed community query (or ACQ), which returns an attributed community (AC) for an attributed graph . The AC is a subgraph of G , which satisfies both structure cohesiveness (i.e., its vertices are tightly connected) and keyword cohesiveness (i.e., its vertices share common keywords). The AC enables a better understanding of how and why a community is formed (e.g., members of an AC have a common interest in music, because they all have the same keyword "music"). An AC can be "personalized"; for example, an ACQ user may specify that an AC returned should be related to some specific keywords like "research" and "sports". To enable efficient AC search, we develop the CL-tree index structure and three algorithms based on it. We evaluate our solutions on four large graphs, namely Flickr, DBLP, Tencent, and DBpedia. Our results show that ACs are more effective and efficient than existing community retrieval approaches. Moreover, an AC contains more precise and personalized information than that of existing community search and detection methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Data mining: concepts and techniques
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-3305 · Cited by 28,531
Finding and evaluating community structure in networks
Newman, M. E. J., & Girvan, M. (2004) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.69.026113 · Cited by 13,931
Fortunato, S. (2010) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.11.002 · Cited by 11,293
Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval
Salton, G., & McGill, M. J. (1983) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 9,680
Mining frequent patterns without candidate generation
Han, J., Pei, J., & Yin, Y. (2000) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/335191.335372 · Cited by 6,402
Mining frequent patterns without candidate generation
Han, J., Pei, J., & Yin, Y. (2000) · Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data · doi:10.1145/342009.335372 · Cited by 3,216
Network structure and minimum degree
Seidman, S. B. (1983) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(83)90028-x · Cited by 1,891
Keyword searching and browsing in databases using BANKS
Bhalotia, G., Hulgeri, A., Nakhe, C., Chakrabarti, S., & Sudarshan, S. (2003) · Proceedings 18th International Conference on Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/icde.2002.994756 · Cited by 871
Graph clustering based on structural/attribute similarities
Zhou, Y., Cheng, H., & Yu, J. X. (2009) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/1687627.1687709 · Cited by 863
4 Community Detection in Networks with Node Attributes
Yang, J., McAuley, J., & Leskovec, J. (2013) · Cited by 803
Cited by
A survey of community search over big graphs
Fang, Y., Huang, X., Qin, L., Zhang, Y., Zhang, W., Cheng, R., & Lin, X. (2020) · The VLDB Journal · doi:10.1007/s00778-019-00556-x · Cited by 339
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Fang, Y., Cheng, R., Luo, S., & Hu, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1233-1244
- ISSN
- 2150-8097 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2547646153
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 19.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effective community search for large attributed graphs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.14778/2994509.2994538
- The paper
- Fang, Y., Cheng, R., Luo, S., & Hu, J. (2016). Effective community search for large attributed graphs. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment. https://doi.org/10.14778/2994509.2994538
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.