Cited by 363Teaching and Learning ProgrammingEducational Robotics and EngineeringStatistics Education and Methodologies

Relationships between reading, tracing and writing skills in introductory programming

Open access
Lopez, Mike, Whalley, Jacqueline, Robbins, Phil, Lister, Raymond·2008·Proceedings of the Fourth international Workshop on Computing Education Research

Abstract

This study analyzed student responses to an examination, after the students had completed one semester of instruction in programming. The performance of students on code tracing tasks correlated with their performance on code writing tasks. A correlation was also found between performance on "explain in plain English" tasks and code writing. A stepwise regression, with performance on code writing as the dependent variable, was used to construct a path diagram. The diagram suggests the possibility of a hierarchy of programming related tasks. Knowledge of programming constructs forms the bottom of the hierarchy, with "explain in English", Parson's puzzles, and the tracing of iterative code forming one or more intermediate levels in the hierarchy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1404520.1404531

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior work in introductory programming has shown that code-reading and tracing skills are essential to problem-solving activities including code-writing.

    “Prior work in introductory programming has shown that code-reading and tracing skills are essential to problem-solving activities including code-writing [49,55,57].”

    From Studying the effect of AI Code Generators on Supporting Novice Learners in Introductory Programming (2023) · cites this paper as [57]

    The Discussion (§6) reports significant associations between code-reading, code-tracing, and code-writing performance. But the paper presents a hierarchy of skills as a possibility, not a demonstrated necessity; its findings do not establish that reading and tracing are essential to problem-solving activities generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [7]7. Biggs, J. B. & Collis, K. F. Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome). New York, Academic Press, 1982.
  2. [11]11. Philpott, A, Robbins, P., and Whalley, J. Accessing The Steps on the Road to Relational Thinking. Proceedings of the 20 th Annual NACCQ.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lopez, M., Whalley, J., Robbins, P., & Lister, R.
Affiliations
  • Manukau Institute of Technology (NZ)
  • Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Venue
Proceedings of the Fourth international Workshop on Computing Education Research
Publisher
ACM
Published
2008-09-06
Pages
101-112
OpenAlex
W2165365113
Cited by
363
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 17
FWCI
11.71
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER) (publishedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Robotics and Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistics Education and Methodologies
Keywords
introductory programming, code tracing, writing software, reading skills, programming constructs, task hierarchy, student performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review