The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating video as a technology for informal communication
Open accessAbstract
Collaborations in organizations thrive on communication that is informal because informal communication is frequent, interactive, and expressive. Informal communication is crucial for the coordination of work, learning an organization's culture, the perpetuation of the social relations that underlie collaboration, and, in general, any situation that requires communication to resolve ambiguity. Informal communication is traditionally mediated by physical proximity, but physical proximity cannot mediate in geographically distributed organizations. The research described here evaluates the adequacy of a version of a desktop video/audio conferencing system for supporting informal communication in a research and development laboratory. The evaluation took place during a trial in which the system was used by summer employees and their supervisor-mentors. While the system was used frequently, the most common uses and users' assessments suggest that it was used more like a telephone or electronic mail than like physically mediated face-to-face communication. However, some features of its use transcended traditional media and allowed users to gain awareness of their work environment. The paper concludes with a discussion of requirements for successful technology to support informal communication.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868
Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.39.10.1123 · Cited by 2,630
Information richness. A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1983) · doi:10.21236/ada128980 · Cited by 2,263 · cited 1×
“Operationally, informal communication differs from formal communication in its greater frequency, expressiveness and interactivity [6, 16, 29].”
Background
Cited by
An empirical study of speed and communication in globally distributed software development
Herbsleb, J. D., & Mockus, A. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2003.1205177 · Cited by 997
Media spaces: bringing people together in a video, audio, and computing environment
Bly, S. A., Harrison, S. R., & Irwin, S. (1993) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/151233.151235 · Cited by 731
Distance, dependencies, and delay in a global collaboration
Herbsleb, J. D., Mockus, A., Finholt, T. A., & Grinter, R. E. (2000) · Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work · doi:10.1145/358916.359003 · Cited by 395
Techniques for addressing fundamental privacy and disruption tradeoffs in awareness support systems
Hudson, S. E., & Smith, I. (1996) · Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work · doi:10.1145/240080.240295 · Cited by 344
Research on Computer Supported Cooperative Work
Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (1997) · Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1016/b978-044481862-1.50125-4 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Fish, R. S., Kraut, R. E., Root, R. W., & Rice, R. E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '92
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1992
- Pages
- 37-48
- OpenAlex
- W2144421702
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.67
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluating video as a technology for informal communication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/142750.142755
- The paper
- Fish, R. S., Kraut, R. E., Root, R. W., & Rice, R. E. (1992). Evaluating video as a technology for informal communication. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '92. https://doi.org/10.1145/142750.142755
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.