The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Secure data deduplication
Abstract
As the world moves to digital storage for archival purposes, there is an increasing demand for systems that can provide secure data storage in a cost-effective manner. By identifying common chunks of data both within and between files and storing them only once, deduplication can yield cost savings by increasing the utility of a given amount of storage. Unfortunately, deduplication exploits identical content, while encryption attempts to make all content appear random; the same content encrypted with two different keys results in very different ciphertext. Thus, combining the space efficiency of deduplication with the secrecy aspects of encryption is problematic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shamir, A. (1979) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/359168.359176 · Cited by 13,756
Proceedings of the 11th USENIX Security Symposium
Boneh, D. (2002) · Cited by 2,528
Freenet: A Distributed Anonymous Information Storage and Retrieval System
Clarke, I., Sandberg, O., Wiley, B., & Hong, T. W. (2001) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-44702-4_4 · Cited by 2,109
Ceph: a scalable, high-performance distributed file system
Weil, S. A., Brandt, S., Miller, E. L., Long, D. D. E., & Maltzahn, C. (2006) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · doi:10.5555/1298455.1298485 · Cited by 1,402
Self-citationA low-bandwidth network file system
Muthitacharoen, A., Chen, B., & Mazières, D. (2001) · Proceedings of the eighteenth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles · doi:10.1145/502034.502052 · Cited by 784
Farsite: federated, available, and reliable storage for an incompletely trusted environment
Adya, A., Bolosky, W. J., Castro, M., Cermak, G., Chaiken, R., Douceur, J. R., Howell, J., Lorch, J. R., Theimer, M., & Wattenhofer, R. P. (2002) · ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review · doi:10.1145/844128.844130 · Cited by 780
Venti: A New Approach to Archival Storage
Quinlan, S., & Dorward, S. (2002) · Cited by 732
Goldschlag, D., Reed, M., & Syverson, P. (1999) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/293411.293443 · Cited by 689
Reclaiming space from duplicate files in a serverless distributed file system
Douceur, J. R., Adya, A., Bolosky, W. J., Simon, P., & Theimer, M. (2003) · Proceedings 22nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems · doi:10.1109/icdcs.2002.1022312 · Cited by 645
Plutus: Scalable Secure File Sharing on Untrusted Storage
Kallahalla, M., Riedel, E., Swaminathan, R., Wang, Q., & Fu, K. E. (2003) · Cited by 614
Cited by
Message-Locked Encryption and Secure Deduplication
Bellare, M., Keelveedhi, S., & Ristenpart, T. (2013) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-38348-9_18 · Cited by 632
Side Channels in Cloud Services: Deduplication in Cloud Storage
Harnik, D., Pinkas, B., & Shulman-Peleg, A. (2010) · IEEE Security & Privacy Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2010.187 · Cited by 522
Metadata
- Authors
- Storer, M. W., Greenan, K., Long, D. D. E., & Miller, E. L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 4th ACM international workshop on Storage security and survivability
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2008-10-31
- Pages
- 1-10
- OpenAlex
- W2009191935
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 4.22
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Secure data deduplication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1456469.1456471
- The paper
- Storer, M. W., Greenan, K., Long, D. D. E., & Miller, E. L. (2008). Secure data deduplication. Proceedings of the 4th ACM international workshop on Storage security and survivability. https://doi.org/10.1145/1456469.1456471
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
