The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cross-disciplinary perspectives on meta-learning for algorithm selection
Abstract
The algorithm selection problem [Rice 1976] seeks to answer the question:Which algorithm is likely to perform best for my problem?Recognizing the problem as a learning task in the early 1990's, the machine learning community has developed the field of meta-learning, focused on learning about learning algorithm performance on classification problems. But there has been only limited generalization of these ideas beyond classification, and many related attempts have been made in other disciplines (such as AI and operations research) to tackle the algorithm selection problem in different ways, introducing different terminology, and overlooking the similarities of approaches. In this sense, there is much to be gained from a greater awareness of developments in meta-learning, and how these ideas can be generalized to learn about the behaviors of other (nonlearning) algorithms. In this article we present a unified framework for considering the algorithm selection problem as a learning problem, and use this framework to tie together the crossdisciplinary developments in tackling the algorithm selection problem. We discuss the generalization of meta-learning concepts to algorithms focused on tasks including sorting, forecasting, constraint satisfaction, and optimization, and the extension of these ideas to bioinformatics, cryptography, and other fields.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486
Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1205
(1999) · Industrial Robot: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/ir.1999.04926fae.001 · Cited by 38,662
Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques
(2011) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-19715-5 · Cited by 25,437
UCI Machine Learning Repository
Asuncion, A. (2007) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 24,155
No free lunch theorems for optimization
Wolpert, D. H., & Macready, W. G. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/4235.585893 · Cited by 14,237
Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Machine learning
(2007) · doi:10.1145/1273496 · Cited by 11,630
Witten, I. H. (2008) · Cited by 9,143
Self-Organization and Associative Memory
Kohonen, T. (1989) · Springer Series in Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-88163-3 · Cited by 8,740
Wolpert, D. H. (1992) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(05)80023-1 · Cited by 7,951
Self-Organization and Associative Memory
Kohonen, T. (1988) · Springer Series in Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-00784-6 · Cited by 3,812
Cited by
(2011) · Cited by 675
EVALUATION OF CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHMS USING MCDM AND RANK CORRELATION
KOU, G., LU, Y., PENG, Y., & SHI, Y. (2012) · International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making · doi:10.1142/s0219622012500095 · Cited by 566
Automated Algorithm Selection: Survey and Perspectives
Kerschke, P., Hoos, H. H., Neumann, F., & Trautmann, H. (2019) · Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1162/evco_a_00242 · Cited by 435
Algorithm runtime prediction: Methods & evaluation
Hutter, F., Xu, L., Hoos, H. H., & Leyton-Brown, K. (2014) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2013.10.003 · Cited by 395
Metalearning: A survey of trends and technologies
Lemke, C., Budka, M., & Gabrys, B. (2015) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-013-9406-y · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith-Miles, K. A.
- Venue
- ACM Computing Surveys
- Published
- 2009-01-15
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-25
- ISSN
- 0360-0300 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7341
- OpenAlex
- W2089213632
- Cited by
- 552
- References
- 72
- FWCI
- 30.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on meta-learning for algorithm selection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1456650.1456656
- The paper
- Smith-Miles, K. A. (2009). Cross-disciplinary perspectives on meta-learning for algorithm selection. ACM Computing Surveys. https://doi.org/10.1145/1456650.1456656
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.