Cited by 365Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningMachine Learning and AlgorithmsMachine Learning and Data Classification

Metalearning: A survey of trends and technologies

Open access
Lemke, Christiane, Budka, Marcin, Gabrys, Bogdan·2015·Artificial Intelligence Review

Abstract

Metalearning attracted considerable interest in the machine learning community in the last years. Yet, some disagreement remains on what does or what does not constitute a metalearning problem and in which contexts the term is used in. This survey aims at giving an all-encompassing overview of the research directions pursued under the umbrella of metalearning, reconciling different definitions given in scientific literature, listing the choices involved when designing a metalearning system and identifying some of the future research challenges in this domain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10462-013-9406-y

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Design issues on data collection, pre-processing, cleaning, labeling and augmentation, including big data challenges, exist for ML applications.

    “-Data Design: Design issues on data collection, pre-processing, cleaning, labeling and augmentation, including big data challenges [17,23,25-27, 31,33,41,44,74-76,105,114-116].”
  • Training data, ML models and ML platforms are key components of ML applications, and challenges on the quality of each component have been discussed, including data anomaly, imbalanced or biased data, encrypted data, data evaluation/cleaning, and novelty detection.

    “-Component Quality: Training data, ML models and ML platforms (e.g.scikit-learn [125], Tensor flow [126], Weka [127]) is the key components of ML applications.The challenges on the quality of each components have been discussed.The challenge issues on data quality for ML applications includes data anomaly [23], imbalanced or biased data, encrypted data [60], data evaluation/cleaning [39][40][41]74”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Brazdil P Giraud-Carrier C Soares C Vilalta R Metalearning: applications to data mining 2009 Berlin Springer
  2. Köpf C, Iglezakis I (2002) Combination of task description strategies and case base properties for meta-learning. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on integration and collaboration aspects of data mining, decision support and meta-learning, pp 65–76
  3. Nguyen P, Kalousis A, Hilario M (2011) A meta-mining infrastructure to support kd workflow optimization. In: eCML PKDD 2011, p 1
  4. Nguyen P, Kalousis A, Hilario M (2012) Experimental evaluation of the e-lico meta-miner. In: 5th planning to learn workshop WS28 at ECAI 2012, p 18
  5. Vanschoren J (2010) Understanding machine learning performance with experiment databases. PhD thesis, Arenberg Doctoral School of Science, Engineering & Technology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lemke, C., Budka, M., & Gabrys, B.
Affiliations
Bournemouth University (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Lemke, Christiane
  • Budka, Marcin
Venue
Artificial Intelligence Review
Published
2013-07-20
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
117-130
ISSN
  • 0269-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7462
OpenAlex
W2091118421
Cited by
365
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2
FWCI
5.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Artificial Intelligence Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bournemouth University Research Online (Bournemouth University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (2007–2013, FP7 2007-2013, FP7/2007, 251617)
  • Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007, FP7/2007 - 2013, 2007‐2013)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
Keywords
meta-learning, research directions, future research challenges

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review