The DOI matches its Crossref record.
IP is dead, long live IP for wireless sensor networks
Abstract
A decade ago as wireless sensor network research took off many researchers in the field denounced the use of IP as inadequate and in contradiction to the needs of wireless sensor networking. Since then the field has matured, standard links have emerged, and IP has evolved. In this paper, we present the design of a complete IPv6-based network architecture for wireless sensor networks. We validate the architecture with a production-quality implementation that incorporates many techniques pioneered in the sensor network community, including duty-cycled link protocols, header compression, hop-by-hop forwarding, and efficient routing with effective link estimation. In addition to providing interoperability with existing IP devices, this implementation was able to achieve an average duty-cycle of 0.65%, average per-hop latency of 62ms, and a data reception rate of 99.98% over a period of 4 weeks in a real-world home-monitoring application where each node generates one application packet per minute. Our results outperform existing systems that do not adhere to any particular standard or architecture. In light of this demonstration of full IPv6 capability, we review the central arguments that led the field away from IP. We believe that the presence of an architecture, specifically an IPv6-based one, provides a strong foundation for wireless sensor networks going forward.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
New Generation Sensor Web Enablement
Bröring, A., Echterhoff, J., Jirka, S., Simonis, I., Everding, T., Stasch, C., Liang, S., & Lemmens, R. (2011) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s110302652 · Cited by 437
From wireless sensor networks towards cyber physical systems
Wu, F.-J., Kao, Y.-F., & Tseng, Y.-C. (2011) · Pervasive and Mobile Computing · doi:10.1016/j.pmcj.2011.03.003 · Cited by 329
Gaddour, O., & Koubâa, A. (2012) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2012.06.016 · Cited by 323
Cybersecurity of industrial cyber-physical systems: A review
Kayan, H., Nunes, M., Rana, O., Burnap, P., & Perera, C. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3510410 · Cited by 261
IETF Standardization in the Field of the Internet of Things (IoT): A Survey
Ishaq, I., Carels, D., Teklemariam, G., Hoebeke, J., Abeele, F., Poorter, E., Moerman, I., & Demeester, P. (2013) · Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks · doi:10.3390/jsan2020235 · Cited by 226
Metadata
- Authors
- Hui, J. W., & Culler, D. E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on Embedded network sensor systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2008-11-05
- Pages
- 15-28
- OpenAlex
- W2004662500
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.61
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: IP is dead, long live IP for wireless sensor networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1460412.1460415
- The paper
- Hui, J. W., & Culler, D. E. (2008). IP is dead, long live IP for wireless sensor networks. Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on Embedded network sensor systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/1460412.1460415
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.