The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The influence of agent reliability on trust in human-agent collaboration
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“(II) Reliability is positively associated with all outcomes examined in HATs.”
From Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature (2022) · cites this paper as Fan et al. (2008)
In the citing paper
“Trust was most often measured using self-report surveys, although occasionally it was inferred based on human behaviors (e.g., Fan et al., 2008).”
From Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature (2022) · cites this paper as Fan et al., 2008
In the citing paper
“lower trust (Hafizoğlu & Sen, 2018a, 2018b), unless participants were made aware of the ways in which reliability was lower (Fan et al., 2008).”
From Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature (2022) · cites this paper as Fan et al., 2008
In the citing paper
“when human operators were aware of the lower reliability (higher transparency), they were more trusting (Fan et al., 2008)”
From Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature (2022) · cites this paper as Fan et al., 2008
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392 · Cited by 6,605 · cited 4×
“Findings/Design Results revealed that teams with experienced human operators accepted significantly less inappropriate recommendations from agents than teams with inexperienced operators.”
BackgroundInfluentialHumans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse
Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872097778543886 · Cited by 4,554
The role of trust in automation reliance
Dzindolet, M. T., Peterson, S. A., Pomranky, R. A., Pierce, L. G., & Beck, H. P. (2003) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/s1071-5819(03)00038-7 · Cited by 1,276
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Bradshaw , J. ; Sierhuis , M. ; Acquisti , A. ; Gawdiak , Y. ; Prescott , D. ; Jeffers , R. ; Suri , N. ; and van Hoof , R. 2002 . What we can learn about human-agent teamwork from practice . In Workshop on Teamwork and Coalition Formation, Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems (AAMAS 02) . Bradshaw, J.; Sierhuis, M.; Acquisti, A.; Gawdiak, Y.; Prescott, D.; Jeffers, R.; Suri, N.; and van Hoof, R. 2002. What we can learn about human-agent teamwork from practice. In Workshop on Teamwork and Coalition Formation, Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems (AAMAS 02).
- Cannon-Bowers , J. A. ; Salas , E. ; and Converse , S. 1990 . Cognitive psychology and team training: Training shared mental models and complex systems . Human Factors Society Bulletin 33 : 1 -- 4 . Cannon-Bowers, J. A.; Salas, E.; and Converse, S. 1990. Cognitive psychology and team training: Training shared mental models and complex systems. Human Factors Society Bulletin 33:1--4.
- 10.2307/2216075 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/001872676001300202 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1518/001872095779049543 · DOI · Paper page
- Fan , X. , and Yen , J . 2007. R-CAST: Integrating team intelligence for human-centered teamwork . In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'07) , 1535--1541. Fan, X., and Yen, J. 2007. R-CAST: Integrating team intelligence for human-centered teamwork. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'07), 1535--1541.
- 10.1145/1160633.1160637 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.artint.2005.06.005 · DOI
- 10.1080/1463922021000054335 · DOI · Paper page
- Klein , G. A. 1997. The recognition-primed decision (rpd) model: Looking back, looking forward . In Naturalistic decision making ( Eds : C. E. Zsambok and G. Klein). Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc . 285--292. Klein, G. A. 1997. The recognition-primed decision (rpd) model: Looking back, looking forward. In Naturalistic decision making (Eds: C. E. Zsambok and G. Klein). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 285--292.
- 10.1518/hfes.46.1.50.30392 · doi:10.1518/hfes.46.1.50.30392 · Paper page
- Lennox T. L.; Payne T.; Hahn S. K.; Lewis M.; and Sycara K. 1999. MokSAF: How should we support teamwork in human-agent teams? Technical Report CMU-RITR- 99-31 Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon University PA. Lennox T. L.; Payne T.; Hahn S. K.; Lewis M.; and Sycara K. 1999. MokSAF: How should we support teamwork in human-agent teams? Technical Report CMU-RITR- 99-31 Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon University PA. · doi:10.21236/ada598573
- Norling , E. ; Sonenberg , L. ; and Ronnquist , R . 2000. Enhancing multi-agent based simulation with human-like decision making strategies. In Moss, S., and Davidsson, P., eds ., Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Multi-Agent Based Simulation, 214--228 . Norling, E.; Sonenberg, L.; and Ronnquist, R. 2000. Enhancing multi-agent based simulation with human-like decision making strategies. In Moss, S., and Davidsson, P., eds., Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Multi-Agent Based Simulation, 214--228.
- 10.5555/1018409.1018755 · doi:10.5555/1018409.1018755
Cited by
Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research
Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0057 · Cited by 2,921
Trust in Automation: Integrating Empirical Evidence on Factors That Influence Trust
Hoff, K. A., & Bashir, M. (2015) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720814547570 · Cited by 2,817
Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature
O’Neill, T., McNeese, N., Barron, A., & Schelble, B. (2022) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720820960865 · Cited by 695
How to Evaluate Trust in AI-Assisted Decision Making? A Survey of Empirical Methodologies
Vereschak, O., Bailly, G., & Caramiaux, B. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3476068 · Cited by 229
Figueroa-Armijos, M., Clark, B. B., & da Motta Veiga, S. P. (2023) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-022-05166-2 · Cited by 164
The Impact of Training on Human–Autonomy Team Communications and Trust Calibration
Johnson, C. J., Demir, M., McNeese, N. J., Gorman, J. C., Wolff, A. T., & Cooke, N. J. (2023) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/00187208211047323 · Cited by 68
Kahr, P. K., Rooks, G., Willemsen, M. C., & Snijders, C. C. P. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/3686164 · Cited by 49
Daronnat, S., Azzopardi, L., Halvey, M., & Dubiel, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2021.642201 · Cited by 45
The Trust Recovery Journey. The Effect of Timing of Errors on the Willingness to Follow AI Advice.
Kahr, P. K., Rooks, G., Snijders, C., & Willemsen, M. C. (2024) · Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces · doi:10.1145/3640543.3645167 · Cited by 21
Team dynamics in human-AI collaboration: effects on confidence, satisfaction, and accountability
Yousefi, M., Shahi, A., Sharifi, M., J Jorge Romera, A., Hoermann, S., & Piumsomboon, T. (2025) · Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction · doi:10.1145/3716553.3750776 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Fan, X., Oh, S., McNeese, M., Yen, J., Cuevas, H., Strater, L., & Endsley, M. R.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University, Erie, PA
- Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
- SA Technologies, Inc., Marietta, GA
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 15th European conference on Cognitive ergonomics: the ergonomics of cool interaction
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2008-01-16
- Pages
- 1-8
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 3
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
