The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficient influence maximization in social networks
Abstract
Influence maximization is the problem of finding a small subset of nodes (seed nodes) in a social network that could maximize the spread of influence. In this paper, we study the efficient influence maximization from two complementary directions. One is to improve the original greedy algorithm of [5] and its improvement [7] to further reduce its running time, and the second is to propose new degree discount heuristics that improves influence spread. We evaluate our algorithms by experiments on two large academic collaboration graphs obtained from the online archival database arXiv.org. Our experimental results show that (a) our improved greedy algorithm achieves better running time comparing with the improvement of [7] with matching influence spread, (b) our degree discount heuristics achieve much better influence spread than classic degree and centrality-based heuristics, and when tuned for a specific influence cascade model, it achieves almost matching influence thread with the greedy algorithm, and more importantly (c) the degree discount heuristics run only in milliseconds while even the improved greedy algorithms run in hours in our experiment graphs with a few tens of thousands of nodes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557
Matrix multiplication via arithmetic progressions
Coppersmith, D., & Winograd, S. (1990) · Journal of Symbolic Computation · doi:10.1016/s0747-7171(08)80013-2 · Cited by 2,248
Cited by
Scalable influence maximization for prevalent viral marketing in large-scale social networks
Chen, W., Wang, C., & Wang, Y. (2010) · Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/1835804.1835934 · Cited by 1,731
Self-citationInfluence Maximization in Near-Linear Time: A Martingale Approach
Tang, Y., Shi, Y., & Xiao, X. (2015) · Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data · doi:10.1145/2723372.2723734 · Cited by 768
Influence Maximization on Social Graphs: A Survey
Li, Y., Fan, J., Wang, Y., & Tan, K.-L. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2018.2807843 · Cited by 659
Self-citationA data-based approach to social influence maximization
Goyal, A., Bonchi, F., & Lakshmanan, L. V. S. (2011) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/2047485.2047492 · Cited by 428
Influence Blocking Maximization in Social Networks under the Competitive Linear Threshold Model
He, X., Song, G., Chen, W., & Jiang, Q. (2012) · Proceedings of the 2012 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1137/1.9781611972825.40 · Cited by 403
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, W., Wang, Y., & Yang, S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2009-06-28
- Pages
- 199-208
- OpenAlex
- W2108858998
- Cited by
- 2,156
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 55.43
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficient influence maximization in social networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1557019.1557047
- The paper
- Chen, W., Wang, Y., & Yang, S. (2009). Efficient influence maximization in social networks. Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. https://doi.org/10.1145/1557019.1557047
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.