The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning to recommend with social trust ensemble
Abstract
As an indispensable technique in the field of Information Filtering, Recommender System has been well studied and developed both in academia and in industry recently. However, most of current recommender systems suffer the following problems: (1) The large-scale and sparse data of the user-item matrix seriously affect the recommendation quality. As a result, most of the recommender systems cannot easily deal with users who have made very few ratings. (2) The traditional recommender systems assume that all the users are independent and identically distributed; this assumption ignores the connections among users, which is not consistent with the real world recommendations. Aiming at modeling recommender systems more accurately and realistically, we propose a novel probabilistic factor analysis framework, which naturally fuses the users' tastes and their trusted friends' favors together. In this framework, we coin the term Social Trust Ensemble to represent the formulation of the social trust restrictions on the recommender systems. The complexity analysis indicates that our approach can be applied to very large datasets since it scales linearly with the number of observations, while the experimental results show that our method performs better than the state-of-the-art approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms
Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J., & Riedl, J. (2001) · Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/371920.372071 · Cited by 9,135
Cited by
Bias and Debias in Recommender System: A Survey and Future Directions
Chen, J., Dong, H., Wang, X., Feng, F., Wang, M., & He, X. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3564284 · Cited by 741
DeepInf: Social Influence Prediction with Deep Learning
Qiu, J., Tang, J., Ma, H., Dong, Y., Wang, K., & Tang, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3219819.3220077 · Cited by 587
Self-citationCircle-based recommendation in online social networks
Yang, X., Steck, H., & Liu, Y. (2012) · Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/2339530.2339728 · Cited by 346
Chen, R., Hua, Q., Chang, Y.-S., Wang, B., Zhang, L., & Kong, X. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2877208 · Cited by 312
A Deep Graph Neural Network-Based Mechanism for Social Recommendations
Guo, Z., & Wang, H. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2020.2986316 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Ma, H., King, I., & Lyu, M. R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2009-07-19
- Pages
- 203-210
- OpenAlex
- W2093219534
- Cited by
- 859
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.92
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning to recommend with social trust ensemble. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1571941.1571978
- The paper
- Ma, H., King, I., & Lyu, M. R. (2009). Learning to recommend with social trust ensemble. Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. https://doi.org/10.1145/1571941.1571978
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.