Cited by 233Complex Network Analysis TechniquesRecommender Systems and TechniquesOnline Learning and Analytics

Scalable learning of collective behavior based on sparse social dimensions

Tang, Lei, Liu, Huan·2009·Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management

Abstract

The study of collective behavior is to understand how individuals behave in a social network environment. Oceans of data generated by social media like Facebook, Twitter, Flickr and YouTube present opportunities and challenges to studying collective behavior in a large scale. In this work, we aim to learn to predict collective behavior in social media. In particular, given information about some individuals, how can we infer the behavior of unobserved individuals in the same network? A social-dimension based approach is adopted to address the heterogeneity of connections presented in social media. However, the networks in social media are normally of colossal size, involving hundreds of thousands or even millions of actors. The scale of networks entails scalable learning of models for collective behavior prediction. To address the scalability issue, we propose an edge-centric clustering scheme to extract sparse social dimensions. With sparse social dimensions, the socialdimension based approach can efficiently handle networks of millions of actors while demonstrating comparable prediction performance as other non-scalable methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1645953.1646094

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • EdgeCluster uses k-means clustering to cluster the adjacency matrix of G.

    “EdgeCluster [40]: This method uses k -means clustering to cluster the adjacency matrix of G .”

    From DeepWalk: online learning of social representations (2014) · cites this paper as [40]

  • EdgeCluster has been shown to perform comparably to the Modularity method, with the added advantage of scaling to graphs which are too large for spectral decomposition.

    “Its has been shown to perform comparably to the Modularity method, with the added advantage of scaling to graphs which are too large for spectral decomposition.”

    From DeepWalk: online learning of social representations (2014) · cites this paper as [40]

  • YouTube is a social network between users of the popular video sharing website.

    “YouTube [40] is a social network between users of the popular video sharing website.”

    From DeepWalk: online learning of social representations (2014) · cites this paper as [40]

  • In YouTube, the labels represent groups of viewers that enjoy common video genres.

    “The labels here represent groups of viewers that enjoy common video genres (e.g. anime and wrestling ).”

    From DeepWalk: online learning of social representations (2014) · cites this paper as [40]

  • Most methods require global information and are offline.

    “Most methods require global information and are offline [16,39-41].”

    From DeepWalk: online learning of social representations (2014) · cites this paper as [40]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 233

Authors
Tang, L., & Liu, H.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management
Publisher
ACM
Published
2009-11-02
Pages
1107-1116
ISSN
2155-0751 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105543219
Cited by
233
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 13
FWCI
11.89
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
Keywords
social media, social dimension, scalability, social network analysis, large-scale networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review