Scalable learning of collective behavior based on sparse social dimensions
Abstract
The study of collective behavior is to understand how individuals behave in a social network environment. Oceans of data generated by social media like Facebook, Twitter, Flickr and YouTube present opportunities and challenges to studying collective behavior in a large scale. In this work, we aim to learn to predict collective behavior in social media. In particular, given information about some individuals, how can we infer the behavior of unobserved individuals in the same network? A social-dimension based approach is adopted to address the heterogeneity of connections presented in social media. However, the networks in social media are normally of colossal size, involving hundreds of thousands or even millions of actors. The scale of networks entails scalable learning of models for collective behavior prediction. To address the scalability issue, we propose an edge-centric clustering scheme to extract sparse social dimensions. With sparse social dimensions, the socialdimension based approach can efficiently handle networks of millions of actors while demonstrating comparable prediction performance as other non-scalable methods.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
EdgeCluster uses k-means clustering to cluster the adjacency matrix of G.
“EdgeCluster [40]: This method uses k -means clustering to cluster the adjacency matrix of G .”
From DeepWalk: online learning of social representations (2014) · cites this paper as [40]
EdgeCluster has been shown to perform comparably to the Modularity method, with the added advantage of scaling to graphs which are too large for spectral decomposition.
“Its has been shown to perform comparably to the Modularity method, with the added advantage of scaling to graphs which are too large for spectral decomposition.”
From DeepWalk: online learning of social representations (2014) · cites this paper as [40]
YouTube is a social network between users of the popular video sharing website.
“YouTube [40] is a social network between users of the popular video sharing website.”
From DeepWalk: online learning of social representations (2014) · cites this paper as [40]
In YouTube, the labels represent groups of viewers that enjoy common video genres.
“The labels here represent groups of viewers that enjoy common video genres (e.g. anime and wrestling ).”
From DeepWalk: online learning of social representations (2014) · cites this paper as [40]
Most methods require global information and are offline.
“Most methods require global information and are offline [16,39-41].”
From DeepWalk: online learning of social representations (2014) · cites this paper as [40]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 233
- Authors
- Tang, L., & Liu, H.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2009-11-02
- Pages
- 1107-1116
- ISSN
- 2155-0751 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2105543219
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 11.89
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Keywords
- social media, social dimension, scalability, social network analysis, large-scale networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review