The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On lightweight mobile phone application certification
Abstract
Users have begun downloading an increasingly large number of mobile phone applications in response to advancements in handsets and wireless networks. The increased number of applications results in a greater chance of installing Trojans and similar malware. In this paper, we propose the Kirin security service for Android, which performs lightweight certification of applications to mitigate malware at install time. Kirin certification uses security rules, which are templates designed to conservatively match undesirable properties in security configuration bundled with applications. We use a variant of security requirements engineering techniques to perform an in-depth security analysis of Android to produce a set of rules that match malware characteristics. In a sample of 311 of the most popular applications downloaded from the official Android Market, Kirin and our rules found 5 applications that implement dangerous functionality and therefore should be installed with extreme caution. Upon close inspection, another five applications asserted dangerous rights, but were within the scope of reasonable functional needs. These results indicate that security configuration bundled with Android applications provides practical means of detecting malware.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Necula, G. C. (1997) · Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages - POPL '97 · doi:10.1145/263699.263712 · Cited by 1,843
The Trustworthy Computing Security Development Lifecycle
Lipner, S. (2005) · 20th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference · doi:10.1109/csac.2004.41 · Cited by 234
Cited by
Enck (2014) · doi:10.1145/2619091 · Cited by 1,203
Android permissions: user attention, comprehension, and behavior
Felt, A. P., Ha, E., Egelman, S., Haney, A., Chin, E., & Wagner, D. (2012) · Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security · doi:10.1145/2335356.2335360 · Cited by 1,022
Consumer attitude and intention to adopt mobile wallet in India – An empirical study
Chawla, D., & Joshi, H. (2019) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/ijbm-09-2018-0256 · Cited by 518
Why eve and mallory love android: an analysis of android SSL (in)security
Fahl, S., Harbach, M., Muders, T., Baumgärtner, L., Freisleben, B., & Smith, M. (2012) · Proceedings of the 2012 ACM conference on Computer and communications security · doi:10.1145/2382196.2382205 · Cited by 490
A Survey of App Store Analysis for Software Engineering
Martin, W., Sarro, F., Jia, Y., Zhang, Y., & Harman, M. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2016.2630689 · Cited by 459
Metadata
- Authors
- Enck, W., Ongtang, M., & McDaniel, P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 16th ACM conference on Computer and communications security
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2009-11-09
- Pages
- 235-245
- ISSN
- 1543-7221 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2003276999
- Cited by
- 921
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 53.07
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On lightweight mobile phone application certification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1653662.1653691
- The paper
- Enck, W., Ongtang, M., & McDaniel, P. (2009). On lightweight mobile phone application certification. Proceedings of the 16th ACM conference on Computer and communications security. https://doi.org/10.1145/1653662.1653691
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.