The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Equip tourists with knowledge mined from travelogues
Abstract
With the prosperity of tourism and Web 2.0 technologies, more and more people have willingness to share their travel experiences on the Web (e.g., weblogs, forums, or Web 2.0 communities). These so-called travelogues contain rich information, particularly including location-representative knowledge such as attractions (e.g., Golden Gate Bridge), styles (e.g., beach, history), and activities (e.g., diving, surfing). The location-representative information in travelogues can greatly facilitate other tourists' trip planning, if it can be correctly extracted and summarized. However, since most travelogues are unstructured and contain much noise, it is difficult for common users to utilize such knowledge effectively. In this paper, to mine location-representative knowledge from a large collection of travelogues, we propose a probabilistic topic model, named as Location-Topic model. This model has the advantages of (1) differentiability between two kinds of topics, i.e., local topics which characterize locations and global topics which represent other common themes shared by various locations, and (2) representation of locations in the local topic space to encode both location-representative knowledge and similarities between locations. Some novel applications are developed based on the proposed model, including (1) destination recommendation for on flexible queries, (2) characteristic summarization for a given destination with representative tags and snippets, and (3) identification of informative parts of a travelogue and enriching such highlights with related images. Based on a large collection of travelogues, the proposed framework is evaluated using both objective and subjective evaluation methods and shows promising results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Griffiths, T. L., & Steyvers, M. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0307752101 · Cited by 6,049
Cited by
Discovering geographical topics in the twitter stream
Hong, L., Ahmed, A., Gurumurthy, S., Smola, A. J., & Tsioutsiouliklis, K. (2012) · Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/2187836.2187940 · Cited by 377
Urrutikoetxea Arrieta, B., Polo Peña, A. I., & Martínez Medina, C. (2019) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-02-2016-0049 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Hao, Q., Cai, R., Wang, C., Xiao, R., Yang, J.-M., Pang, Y., & Zhang, L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2010-04-26
- Pages
- 401-410
- OpenAlex
- W2103399083
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.59
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Equip tourists with knowledge mined from travelogues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1772690.1772732
- The paper
- Hao, Q., Cai, R., Wang, C., Xiao, R., Yang, J.-M., Pang, Y., & Zhang, L. (2010). Equip tourists with knowledge mined from travelogues. Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web. https://doi.org/10.1145/1772690.1772732
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.