The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Discovering geographical topics in the twitter stream
Abstract
Micro-blogging services have become indispensable communication tools for online users for disseminating breaking news, eyewitness accounts, individual expression, and protest groups. Recently, Twitter, along with other online social networking services such as Foursquare, Gowalla, Facebook and Yelp, have started supporting location services in their messages, either explicitly, by letting users choose their places, or implicitly, by enabling geo-tagging, which is to associate messages with latitudes and longitudes. This functionality allows researchers to address an exciting set of questions: 1) How is information created and shared across geographical locations, 2) How do spatial and linguistic characteristics of people vary across regions, and 3) How to model human mobility. Although many attempts have been made for tackling these problems, previous methods are either complicated to be implemented or oversimplified that cannot yield reasonable performance. It is a challenge task to discover topics and identify users' interests from these geo-tagged messages due to the sheer amount of data and diversity of language variations used on these location sharing services. In this paper we focus on Twitter and present an algorithm by modeling diversity in tweets based on topical diversity, geographical diversity, and an interest distribution of the user. Furthermore, we take the Markovian nature of a user's location into account. Our model exploits sparse factorial coding of the attributes, thus allowing us to deal with a large and diverse set of covariates efficiently. Our approach is vital for applications such as user profiling, content recommendation and topic tracking. We show high accuracy in location estimation based on our model. Moreover, the algorithm identifies interesting topics based on location and language.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
A Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm for Linear Inverse Problems
Beck, A., & Teboulle, M. (2009) · SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences · doi:10.1137/080716542 · Cited by 11,952
Griffiths, T. L., & Steyvers, M. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0307752101 · Cited by 6,049
Friendship and mobility: user movement in location-based social networks
Cho, E., Myers, S. A., & Leskovec, J. (2011) · Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/2020408.2020579 · Cited by 2,903
Unsupervised Learning by Probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis
Hofmann, T. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1007617005950 · Cited by 2,456
Nedelman, J. R. (2005) · Computational Statistics · doi:10.1007/bf02741321 · Cited by 1,078
Topic modeling: beyond bag-of-words
Wallach, H. M. (2006) · Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning - ICML '06 · doi:10.1145/1143844.1143967 · Cited by 1,058
Exploring Millions of Footprints in Location Sharing Services
Cheng, Z., Caverlee, J., Lee, K., & Sui, D. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v5i1.14109 · Cited by 684
A Latent Variable Model for Geographic Lexical Variation
Eisenstein, J., O'Connor, B., Smith, N. A., & Xing, E. P. (2018) · Figshare · doi:10.1184/r1/6475412 · Cited by 584
A probabilistic approach to spatiotemporal theme pattern mining on weblogs
Mei, Q., Liu, C., Su, H., & Zhai, C. (2006) · Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/1135777.1135857 · Cited by 332
Cited by
Is the Sample Good Enough? Comparing Data from Twitter's Streaming API with Twitter's Firehose
Morstatter, F., Pfeffer, J., Liu, H., & Carley, K. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v7i1.14401 · Cited by 863
Jointly modeling aspects, ratings and sentiments for movie recommendation (JMARS)
Diao, Q., Qiu, M., Wu, C.-Y., Smola, A. J., Jiang, J., & Wang, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/2623330.2623758 · Cited by 447
Self-citationLearning geographical preferences for point-of-interest recommendation
Liu, B., Fu, Y., Yao, Z., & Xiong, H. (2013) · Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/2487575.2487673 · Cited by 437
Text-Based Twitter User Geolocation Prediction
Han, B., Cook, P., & Baldwin, T. (2014) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.4200 · Cited by 324
Social-media data for urban sustainability
Ilieva, R. T., & McPhearson, T. (2018) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0153-6 · Cited by 291
Metadata
- Authors
- Hong, L., Ahmed, A., Gurumurthy, S., Smola, A. J., & Tsioutsiouliklis, K.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2012-04-16
- Pages
- 769-778
- OpenAlex
- W2149510050
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 59.98
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Discovering geographical topics in the twitter stream. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2187836.2187940
- The paper
- Hong, L., Ahmed, A., Gurumurthy, S., Smola, A. J., & Tsioutsiouliklis, K. (2012). Discovering geographical topics in the twitter stream. Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web. https://doi.org/10.1145/2187836.2187940
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.