The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Factorizing personalized Markov chains for next-basket recommendation
Abstract
Recommender systems are an important component of many websites. Two of the most popular approaches are based on matrix factorization (MF) and Markov chains (MC). MF methods learn the general taste of a user by factorizing the matrix over observed user-item preferences. On the other hand, MC methods model sequential behavior by learning a transition graph over items that is used to predict the next action based on the recent actions of a user. In this paper, we present a method bringing both approaches together. Our method is based on personalized transition graphs over underlying Markov chains. That means for each user an own transition matrix is learned - thus in total the method uses a transition cube. As the observations for estimating the transitions are usually very limited, our method factorizes the transition cube with a pairwise interaction model which is a special case of the Tucker Decomposition. We show that our factorized personalized MC (FPMC) model subsumes both a common Markov chain and the normal matrix factorization model. For learning the model parameters, we introduce an adaption of the Bayesian Personalized Ranking (BPR) framework for sequential basket data. Empirically, we show that our FPMC model outperforms both the common matrix factorization and the unpersonalized MC model both learned with and without factorization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rendle, S. (2010) · 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1109/icdm.2010.127 · Cited by 3,189
Self-citationBERT4Rec: Sequential Recommendation with Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformer
Sun, F., Liu, J., Wu, J., Pei, C., Lin, X., Ou, W., & Jiang, P. (2019) · Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3357384.3357895 · Cited by 2,558
Bao, K., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Wang, W., Feng, F., & He, X. (2023) · Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems · doi:10.1145/3604915.3608857 · Cited by 469
Factorizing YAGO: scalable machine learning for linked data
Nickel, M., Tresp, V., & Kriegel, H.-P. (2012) · Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/2187836.2187874 · Cited by 370
Evaluation of session-based recommendation algorithms
Ludewig, M., & Jannach, D. (2018) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-018-9209-6 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Rendle, S., Freudenthaler, C., & Schmidt-Thieme, L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2010-04-26
- Pages
- 811-820
- OpenAlex
- W2171279286
- Cited by
- 2,692
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.49
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factorizing personalized Markov chains for next-basket recommendation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1772690.1772773
- The paper
- Rendle, S., Freudenthaler, C., & Schmidt-Thieme, L. (2010). Factorizing personalized Markov chains for next-basket recommendation. Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web. https://doi.org/10.1145/1772690.1772773
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.