Factorizing YAGO: scalable machine learning for linked data
Abstract
Vast amounts of structured information have been published in the Semantic Web's Linked Open Data (LOD) cloud and their size is still growing rapidly. Yet, access to this information via reasoning and querying is sometimes difficult, due to LOD's size, partial data inconsistencies and inherent noisiness. Machine Learning offers an alternative approach to exploiting LOD's data with the advantages that Machine Learning algorithms are typically robust to both noise and data inconsistencies and are able to efficiently utilize non-deterministic dependencies in the data. From a Machine Learning point of view, LOD is challenging due to its relational nature and its scale. Here, we present an efficient approach to relational learning on LOD data, based on the factorization of a sparse tensor that scales to data consisting of millions of entities, hundreds of relations and billions of known facts. Furthermore, we show how ontological knowledge can be incorporated in the factorization to improve learning results and how computation can be distributed across multiple nodes. We demonstrate that our approach is able to factorize the YAGO~2 core ontology and globally predict statements for this large knowledge base using a single dual-core desktop computer. Furthermore, we show experimentally that our approach achieves good results in several relational learning tasks that are relevant to Linked Data. Once a factorization has been computed, our model is able to predict efficiently, and wit…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tensor factorization approaches have proved to be an effective statistical relational learning approach for knowledge graph completion.
“Tensor factorization approaches have proved to be an effective SRL approach for KG completion [29, 4, 39, 26].”
From SimplE Embedding for Link Prediction in Knowledge Graphs (2018) · cites this paper as [29]
Cites
Collective Classification in Network Data
Sen, P., Namata, G., Bilgic, M., Getoor, L., Gallagher, B., & Eliassi‐Rad, T. (2008) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1609/aimag.v29i3.2157 · Cited by 3,293 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Learning Entity and Relation Embeddings for Knowledge Graph Completion
Lin, Y., Liu, Z., Sun, M., Liu, Y., & Zhu, X. (2015) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v29i1.9491 · Cited by 3,749 · see citing works
A Survey on Knowledge Graphs: Representation, Acquisition, and Applications
Ji, S., Pan, S., Cambria, E., Marttinen, P., & Yu, P. S. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2021.3070843 · Cited by 2,947 · see citing works
Knowledge Graph Embedding: A Survey of Approaches and Applications
Wang, Q., Mao, Z., Wang, B., & Guo, L. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2017.2754499 · Cited by 2,654 · see citing works
A review: Knowledge reasoning over knowledge graph
Chen, X., Jia, S., & Xiang, Y. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112948 · Cited by 1,035 · see citing works
Bordes, A., Glorot, X., Weston, J., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-013-5363-6 · Cited by 675 · see citing works
SimplE Embedding for Link Prediction in Knowledge Graphs
Kazemi, S. M., & Poole, D. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.04868 · Cited by 476 · see citing works
“In RESCAL [28], the embedding vector for each entity e is v e ∈ R d and for each relation r is v r ∈ R d × d and the similarity function for a triple ( h , r , t ) is v r · vec ( v h ⊗ v t ) , where ⊗ represents the outer product of two vectors and vec ( .”
BackgroundInfluentialNeural-symbolic integration and the Semantic Web
Hitzler, P., Bianchi, F., Ebrahimi, M., & Sarker, M. K. (2020) · Semantic Web · doi:10.3233/sw-190368 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nickel, M., Tresp, V., & Kriegel, H.-P.
- Affiliations
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- Siemens (Germany) (DE)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2012-04-16
- Pages
- 271-280
- OpenAlex
- W2099752825
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 22.07
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Siemens
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Keywords
- YAGO, Linked Open Data, relational learning, knowledge base completion, distributed computing, large-scale knowledge bases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review