Cited by 370Semantic Web and OntologiesAdvanced Graph Neural NetworksTopic Modeling

Factorizing YAGO: scalable machine learning for linked data

Nickel, Maximilian, Tresp, Volker, Kriegel, Hans-Peter·2012·Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web

Abstract

Vast amounts of structured information have been published in the Semantic Web's Linked Open Data (LOD) cloud and their size is still growing rapidly. Yet, access to this information via reasoning and querying is sometimes difficult, due to LOD's size, partial data inconsistencies and inherent noisiness. Machine Learning offers an alternative approach to exploiting LOD's data with the advantages that Machine Learning algorithms are typically robust to both noise and data inconsistencies and are able to efficiently utilize non-deterministic dependencies in the data. From a Machine Learning point of view, LOD is challenging due to its relational nature and its scale. Here, we present an efficient approach to relational learning on LOD data, based on the factorization of a sparse tensor that scales to data consisting of millions of entities, hundreds of relations and billions of known facts. Furthermore, we show how ontological knowledge can be incorporated in the factorization to improve learning results and how computation can be distributed across multiple nodes. We demonstrate that our approach is able to factorize the YAGO~2 core ontology and globally predict statements for this large knowledge base using a single dual-core desktop computer. Furthermore, we show experimentally that our approach achieves good results in several relational learning tasks that are relevant to Linked Data. Once a factorization has been computed, our model is able to predict efficiently, and wit…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2187836.2187874

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tensor factorization approaches have proved to be an effective statistical relational learning approach for knowledge graph completion.

    “Tensor factorization approaches have proved to be an effective SRL approach for KG completion [29, 4, 39, 26].”

    From SimplE Embedding for Link Prediction in Knowledge Graphs (2018) · cites this paper as [29]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nickel, M., Tresp, V., & Kriegel, H.-P.
Affiliations
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • Siemens (Germany) (DE)
Venue
Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web
Publisher
ACM
Published
2012-04-16
Pages
271-280
OpenAlex
W2099752825
Cited by
370
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 4
FWCI
22.07
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Siemens
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
YAGO, Linked Open Data, relational learning, knowledge base completion, distributed computing, large-scale knowledge bases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review