The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
RepFinder: finding approximately repeated scene elements for image editing
Abstract
Repeated elements are ubiquitous and abundant in both manmade and natural scenes. Editing such images while preserving the repetitions and their relations is nontrivial due to overlap, missing parts, deformation across instances, illumination variation, etc. Manually enforcing such relations is laborious and error-prone. We propose a novel framework where user scribbles are used to guide detection and extraction of such repeated elements. Our detection process, which is based on a novel boundary band method, robustly extracts the repetitions along with their deformations. The algorithm only considers the shape of the elements, and ignores similarity based on color, texture, etc. We then use topological sorting to establish a partial depth ordering of overlapping repeated instances. Missing parts on occluded instances are completed using information from other instances. The extracted repeated instances can then be seamlessly edited and manipulated for a variety of high level tasks that are otherwise difficult to perform. We demonstrate the versatility of our framework on a large set of inputs of varying complexity, showing applications to image rearrangement, edit transfer, deformation propagation, and instance replacement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
Lowe, D. G. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94 · Cited by 55,589
Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF)
Bay, H., Ess, A., Tuytelaars, T., & Van Gool, L. (2008) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2007.09.014 · Cited by 13,557
Region Filling and Object Removal by Exemplar-Based Image Inpainting
Criminisi, A., Perez, P., & Toyama, K. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2004.833105 · Cited by 3,258
Graph Cuts and Efficient N-D Image Segmentation
Boykov, Y., & Funka-Lea, G. (2006) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-006-7934-5 · Cited by 1,910
Hoiem, D., Efros, A. A., & Hebert, M. (2005) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/1073204.1073232 · Cited by 616
Cited by
BING: Binarized Normed Gradients for Objectness Estimation at 300fps
Cheng, M.-M., Zhang, Z., Lin, W.-Y., & Torr, P. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.414 · Cited by 1,050
Self-citationArtificial intelligence in the creative industries: a review
Anantrasirichai, N., & Bull, D. (2022) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-021-10039-7 · Cited by 793
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheng, M.-M., Zhang, F.-L., Mitra, N. J., Huang, X., & Hu, S.-M.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Graphics
- Published
- 2010-07-26
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1-8
- ISSN
- 0730-0301 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7368
- OpenAlex
- W2060095179
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 13.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RepFinder: finding approximately repeated scene elements for image editing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1778765.1778820
- The paper
- Cheng, M.-M., Zhang, F.-L., Mitra, N. J., Huang, X., & Hu, S.-M. (2010). RepFinder: finding approximately repeated scene elements for image editing. ACM Transactions on Graphics. https://doi.org/10.1145/1778765.1778820
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.