Cited by 6163D Shape Modeling and AnalysisComputer Graphics and Visualization TechniquesAdvanced Vision and Imaging

Automatic photo pop-up

Hoiem, Derek, Efros, Alexei A., Hebert, Martial·2005·ACM Transactions on Graphics

Abstract

This paper presents a fully automatic method for creating a 3D model from a single photograph. The model is made up of several texture-mapped planar billboards and has the complexity of a typical children's pop-up book illustration. Our main insight is that instead of attempting to recover precise geometry, we statistically model geometric classes defined by their orientations in the scene. Our algorithm labels regions of the input image into coarse categories: "ground", "sky", and "vertical". These labels are then used to "cut and fold" the image into a pop-up model using a set of simple assumptions. Because of the inherent ambiguity of the problem and the statistical nature of the approach, the algorithm is not expected to work on every image. However. it performs surprisingly well for a wide range of scenes taken from a typical person's photo album.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1073204.1073232

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As a baseline we compare against the pose network used by [62], which builds upon [76] with an additional scaling of the translation by the mean of the inverse depth.

    “As a baseline we compare against the pose network used by [62], which builds upon [76] with an additional scaling of the translation by the mean of the inverse depth.”

    From Digging Into Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Estimation (2019) · cites this paper as [62]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoiem, D., Efros, A. A., & Hebert, M.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
ACM Transactions on Graphics
Published
2005-07
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
577-584
ISSN
  • 0730-0301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7368
OpenAlex
W2151996626
Cited by
616
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 33
FWCI
24.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACM Transactions on Graphics (publishedVersion)
  • KiltHub Repository (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
Keywords
automatic 3D model generation, single-image 3D reconstruction, image segmentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review