The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diversity in smartphone usage
Abstract
Using detailed traces from 255 users, we conduct a comprehensive study of smartphone use. We characterize intentional user activities -- interactions with the device and the applications used -- and the impact of those activities on network and energy usage. We find immense diversity among users. Along all aspects that we study, users differ by one or more orders of magnitude. For instance, the average number of interactions per day varies from 10 to 200, and the average amount of data received per day varies from 1 to 1000 MB. This level of diversity suggests that mechanisms to improve user experience or energy consumption will be more effective if they learn and adapt to user behavior. We find that qualitative similarities exist among users that facilitate the task of learning user behavior. For instance, the relative application popularity for can be modeled using an exponential distribution, with different distribution parameters for different users. We demonstrate the value of adapting to user behavior in the context of a mechanism to predict future energy drain. The 90th percentile error with adaptation is less than half compared to predictions based on average behavior across users.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root
Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C. B., Schmidt, P., & Shin, Y. (1992) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-y · Cited by 12,633
Cited by
How “phubbing” becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone
Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.018 · Cited by 954
Cha, S.-S., & Seo, B.-K. (2018) · Health Psychology Open · doi:10.1177/2055102918755046 · Cited by 592
Determinants of phubbing, which is the sum of many virtual addictions: A structural equation model
Karadağ, E., Tosuntaş, Ş. B., Erzen, E., Duru, P., Bostan, N., Şahin, B. M., Çulha, İ., & Babadağ, B. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral Addictions · doi:10.1556/2006.4.2015.005 · Cited by 560
Measuring user confidence in smartphone security and privacy
Chin, E., Felt, A. P., Sekar, V., & Wagner, D. (2012) · Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security · doi:10.1145/2335356.2335358 · Cited by 347
Implicit Authentication through Learning User Behavior
Shi, E., Niu, Y., Jakobsson, M., & Chow, R. (2011) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-18178-8_9 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Falaki, H., Mahajan, R., Kandula, S., Lymberopoulos, D., Govindan, R., & Estrin, D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2010-06-15
- Pages
- 179-194
- OpenAlex
- W2075743842
- Cited by
- 838
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 109.62
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diversity in smartphone usage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1814433.1814453
- The paper
- Falaki, H., Mahajan, R., Kandula, S., Lymberopoulos, D., Govindan, R., & Estrin, D. (2010). Diversity in smartphone usage. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services. https://doi.org/10.1145/1814433.1814453
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.