Cited by 592Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital TechnologySexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Smartphone use and smartphone addiction in middle school students in Korea: Prevalence, social networking service, and game use

Open access
Cha, Seong-Soo, Seo, Bo-Kyung·2018·Health Psychology Open

Abstract

This study aimed to examine smartphone use patterns, smartphone addiction characteristics, and the predictive factors of the smartphone addiction in middle school students in South Korea. According to the Smartphone Addiction Proneness Scale scores, 563 (30.9%) were classified as a risk group for smartphone addiction and 1261 (69.1%) were identified as a normal user group. The adolescents used mobile messengers for the longest, followed by Internet surfing, gaming, and social networking service use. The two groups showed significant differences in smartphone use duration, awareness of game overuse, and purposes of playing games. The predictive factors of smartphone addiction were daily smartphone and social networking service use duration, and the awareness of game overuse.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2055102918755046

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research clearly indicates that smartphone users at risk of PSU show a stronger denial of overuse than normal users and seem to deny that they are addicted to the smartphone.

    “Research clearly indicate that smartphone users at risk of PSU show a stronger denial of overuse than normal users (Cha & Seo, 2018) and seem to deny that they are addicted to the smartphone (Park, 2019).”

    From Antecedents and consequences of problematic smartphone use: A systematic literature review of an emerging research area (2021) · cites this paper as Cha & Seo, 2018

    The Results report that the risk group showed stronger denial than normal users, but the measured denial concerned game overuse specifically, not smartphone overuse generally. The study population was Korean middle school students. The separate assertion about denying smartphone addiction is attributed to Park (2019), not to Cha and Seo. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Problematic smartphone use has been found to impede mental well-being and quality of life in children and adolescents.

    “Problematic behavior has also been discussed for problematic smartphone use [43], which has been found to impede mental well-being and QoL in children and adolescents [76].”

    From Effectiveness of Online and Remote Interventions for Mental Health in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults After the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Literature review (page unavailable) links smartphone addiction and overuse to psychological problems, including anxiety and depression in adolescents. But the Results and Discussion (pages unavailable) found no significant difference in life satisfaction between students at risk of smartphone addiction and normal users. The claim that problematic use has been found to impede quality of life therefore overstates this paper's findings. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Younger individuals seem especially vulnerable to negative aspects of digital media usage, such as problematic smartphone use.

    “Whereas children, adolescents, and young adults can be considered “digital natives” [42], which might make them especially receptive to online interventions, younger individuals also seem to be especially vulnerable to negative aspects of digital media usage (eg, problematic smartphone use) [43].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Abo-Jedi A (2008) Cellphone addiction and its relation to self-closure in a sample of Jordanian university and Amman private university students. The Jordanian Journal for Educational Sciences 4: 137– 150.
  2. Alasdair A Philips J (2017) Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunnication or DECT phones. Available at: http://www.powerwatch.org.uk, pp. 1– 12.
  3. Attamimi A (2011) The reasons for the prevalence of BlackBerry cellphones and the resulting educational effects from the perspective of secondary school students in Abo-Dhabi. Conference on the negative effects of cellphones on secondary school students, UAE, pp. 105– 130 (in Arabic).
  4. Boehmer M Hecht B Schoening J et al (2011) Falling asleep with angry birds, Facebook and kindle—A large scale study on mobile application usage. In: Procceedings of MobileHCI, Stockholm, 30 August-2 September, Stockholm, pp. 47– 56.
  5. Chakraborty S (2006) Mobile phone use patterns amongst university students: A comparative study between India and USA. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
  6. Heron D Shapira NA (2004) Time to log off: New diagnostic criteria for problematic internet use. Current Psychiatry 2(4): 21– 29.
  7. Kahneman D Krueger AB (2006) Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 20(1): 3– 24.
  8. Richard A (2001) Internet Addiction. New York: New York University Press.
  9. Scherer K (1997) College life online: Healthy and unhealthy Internet use. Journal of College Student Development 38: 655– 665.
  10. Young KS (1999) Internet addiction: Symptoms, evaluation, and treatment. In: Vandecreek L Knapp S Jackson TL (eds) Innovations in Clinical Practice: A Sourcebook. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press, pp. 1– 13.
  11. Zulkefly SN Baharudin R (2009) Mobile phone use amongst students in a university of Malaysia: Its correlates and relation to psychological health. European Journal of Scientific Research 37: 206– 218.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cha, S.-S., & Seo, B.-K.
Affiliations
Eulji University (KR)
Corresponding author
Seo, Bo-Kyung
Venue
Health Psychology Open
Published
2018-01
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
2055102918755046-2055102918755046
ISSN
2055-1029 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2788431819
Cited by
592
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 106 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 119 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 9
FWCI
146.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Psychology Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
smartphone addiction, junior high school students, adolescents, mobile gaming, smartphone use patterns, smartphone use duration, predictive factors, South Korea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review