The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Information extraction as a basis for high-precision text classification
Abstract
We describe an approach to text classification that represents a compromise between traditional word-based techniques and in-depth natural language processing. Our approach uses a natural language processing task called “information extraction” as a basis for high-precision text classification. We present three algorithms that use varying amounts of extracted information to classify texts. The relevancy signatures algorithm uses linguistic phrases; the augmented relevancy signatures algorithm uses phrases and local context; and the case-based text classification algorithm uses larger pieces of context. Relevant phrases and contexts are acquired automatically using a training corpus. We evaluate the algorithms on the basis of two test sets from the MUC-4 corpus. All three algorithms achieved high precision on both test sets, with the augmented relevancy signatures algorithm and the case-based algorithm reaching 100% precision with over 60% recall on one set. Additionally, we compare the algorithms on a larger collection of 1700 texts and describe an automated method for empirically deriving appropriate threshold values. The results suggest that information extraction techniques can support high-precision text classification and, in general, that using more extracted information improves performance. As a practical matter, we also explain how the text classification system can be easily ported across domains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank
Marcus, M. (1993) · doi:10.21236/ada273556 · Cited by 7,405
Automatic Indexing: An Experimental Inquiry
Maron, M. E. (1961) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/321075.321084 · Cited by 570 · cited 2×
“For example, Maron [Maron, 1961] also classi ed texts by estimating the conditional probability of a category.”
Cited by
Androutsopoulos, I., Koutsias, J., Chandrinos, K. V., & Spyropoulos, C. D. (2000) · Proceedings of the 23rd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval · doi:10.1145/345508.345569 · Cited by 465
A tourism recommender system based on collaboration and text analysis
LOH, S., LORENZI, F., SALDAÑA, R., & LICTHNOW, D. (2003) · Information Technology & Tourism · doi:10.3727/1098305031436980 · Cited by 111
Extracting Clinical Trial Design Information from MEDLINE Abstracts.
Hara, K., & Matsumoto, Y. (2007) · New Generation Computing · doi:10.1007/s00354-007-0017-5 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Riloff, E., & Lehnert, W.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Information Systems
- Published
- 1994-07
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 296-333
- ISSN
- 1046-8188 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2868
- OpenAlex
- W2097847889
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Information extraction as a basis for high-precision text classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/183422.183428
- The paper
- Riloff, E., & Lehnert, W. (1994). Information extraction as a basis for high-precision text classification. ACM Transactions on Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/183422.183428
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.