The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mining advisor-advisee relationships from research publication networks
Abstract
Information network contains abundant knowledge about relationships among people or entities. Unfortunately, such kind of knowledge is often hidden in a network where different kinds of relationships are not explicitly categorized. For example, in a research publication network, the advisor-advisee relationships among researchers are hidden in the coauthor network. Discovery of those relationships can benefit many interesting applications such as expert finding and research community analysis. In this paper, we take a computer science bibliographic network as an example, to analyze the roles of authors and to discover the likely advisor-advisee relationships. In particular, we propose a time-constrained probabilistic factor graph model (TPFG), which takes a research publication network as input and models the advisor-advisee relationship mining problem using a jointly likelihood objective function. We further design an efficient learning algorithm to optimize the objective function. Based on that our model suggests and ranks probable advisors for every author. Experimental results show that the proposed approach infer advisor-advisee relationships efficiently and achieves a state-of-the-art accuracy (80-90%). We also apply the discovered advisor-advisee relationships to bole search, a specific expert finding task and empirical study shows that the search performance can be effectively improved (+4.09% by [email protected]).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine
Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998) · Computer Networks and ISDN Systems · doi:10.1016/s0169-7552(98)00110-x · Cited by 16,004
Factor graphs and the sum-product algorithm
Kschischang, F. R., Frey, B. J., & Loeliger, H.-A. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/18.910572 · Cited by 6,486 · cited 1×
“There is a general algorithm called sum-product [12] to compute marginal function on a factor graph based on message passing.”
BackgroundIntroduction to Statistical Relational Learning
(2007) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/7432.001.0001 · Cited by 1,643
Relational learning via latent social dimensions
Tang, L., & Liu, H. (2009) · Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/1557019.1557109 · Cited by 799
Cited by
Inferring Social Status and Rich Club Effects in Enterprise Communication Networks
Dong, Y., Tang, J., Chawla, N. V., Lou, T., Yang, Y., & Wang, B. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0119446 · Cited by 438
Self-citationZhang, J., & El-Gohary, N. M. (2016) · Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000346 · Cited by 414
Inferring social ties across heterogenous networks
Tang, J., Lou, T., & Kleinberg, J. (2012) · Proceedings of the fifth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining · doi:10.1145/2124295.2124382 · Cited by 289
Self-citationScholarly knowledge graphs through structuring scholarly communication: a review
Verma, S., Bhatia, R., Harit, S., & Batish, S. (2023) · Complex & Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s40747-022-00806-6 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, C., Han, J., Jia, Y., Tang, J., Zhang, D., Yu, Y., & Guo, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2010-07-25
- Pages
- 203-212
- OpenAlex
- W2021515354
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 62.49
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mining advisor-advisee relationships from research publication networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1835804.1835833
- The paper
- Wang, C., Han, J., Jia, Y., Tang, J., Zhang, D., Yu, Y., & Guo, J. (2010). Mining advisor-advisee relationships from research publication networks. Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. https://doi.org/10.1145/1835804.1835833
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.