Cited by 799Advanced Graph Neural NetworksComplex Network Analysis TechniquesMachine Learning and Algorithms

Relational learning via latent social dimensions

Tang, Lei, Liu, Huan·2009·Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining

Abstract

Social media such as blogs, Facebook, Flickr, etc., presents data in a network format rather than classical IID distribution. To address the interdependency among data instances, relational learning has been proposed, and collective inference based on network connectivity is adopted for prediction. However, connections in social media are often multi-dimensional. An actor can connect to another actor for different reasons, e.g., alumni, colleagues, living in the same city, sharing similar interests, etc. Collective inference normally does not differentiate these connections. In this work, we propose to extract latent social dimensions based on network information, and then utilize them as features for discriminative learning. These social dimensions describe diverse affiliations of actors hidden in the network, and the discriminative learning can automatically determine which affiliations are better aligned with the class labels. Such a scheme is preferred when multiple diverse relations are associated with the same network. We conduct extensive experiments on social media data (one from a real-world blog site and the other from a popular content sharing site). Our model outperforms representative relational learning methods based on collective inference, especially when few labeled data are available. The sensitivity of this model and its connection to existing methods are also examined.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1557019.1557109

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The classes of bloggers in BlogCatalog represent their personal interests.

    “The classes of bloggers represent their personal interests.”

    From A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks (2021) · cites this paper as [127]

  • The BlogCatalog data set is a social network which consists of bloggers and their social relationships.

    “The BlogCatalog data set is a social network which consists of bloggers and their social relationships.”

    From A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks (2021) · cites this paper as [127]

  • BlogCatalog is a network of social relationships provided by blogger authors.

    “BlogCatalog [39] is a network of social relationships provided by blogger authors.”

    From DeepWalk: online learning of social representations (2014) · cites this paper as [39]

  • DeepWalk outperforms other latent representation methods for creating social dimensions, especially when labeled nodes are scarce.

    “DeepWalk outperforms other latent representation methods for creating social dimensions [39, 41], especially when labeled nodes are scarce.”

    From DeepWalk: online learning of social representations (2014) · cites this paper as [39]

  • In Flickr, the labels represent the interest groups of the users.

    “The labels represent the interest groups of the users such as ' black and white photos '.”

    From DeepWalk: online learning of social representations (2014) · cites this paper as [39]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 799

Authors
Tang, L., & Liu, H.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
Publisher
ACM
Published
2009-06-28
Pages
817-826
OpenAlex
W2046253692
Cited by
799
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 104 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 67 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 22
FWCI
13.84
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Air Force Office of Scientific Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
Keywords
relational learning, social media, collective inference, discriminative learning, network characteristics, limited labeled data, blog data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review