Cited by 27Green IT and SustainabilityEnergy Efficiency in ComputingEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Shipping to streaming: is this shift green?

Open access
Seetharam, Anand, Somasundaram, Manikandan, Towsley, Don, Kurose, Jim, Shenoy, Prashant·2010·Proceedings of the first ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Green networking

Abstract

Streaming movies over the Internet has become increasingly popular in recent years as an alternative to mailing DVDs to a customer. In this paper we investigate the environmental- and energy-related impacts of these two methods of movie content delivery. We compare the total energy consumed and the carbon footprint impact of these two delivery methods and find that the non-energy optimized streaming of a movie through the Internet consumes approximately 78% of the energy needed to ship a movie, but has a carbon footprint that is approximately 100% higher. However, by taking advantage of recently proposed "greening of IT" techniques in the research literature for the serving and transmission of the movie, we find that the energy consumption and carbon footprint of streaming can be reduced to approximately 30% and 65% respectively of that of shipping. We also consider how this tradeoff may change in the future.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1851290.1851304

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies highlight potential savings from streaming videos versus DVD rental when driving to the rental outlet by car.

    “Other studies highlight the potentials savings from streaming videos versus DVD rental when driving to the rental outlet by car [140,141].”

    From Digitalization and the Decoupling Debate: Can ICT Help to Reduce Environmental Impacts While the Economy Keeps Growing? (2020) · cites this paper as [140]

    The Conclusion reports potential energy and carbon-footprint savings from streaming, but its comparator is DVDs shipped by mail. Section 3 identifies Netflix’s mail-delivery service as the model; the paper does not assess customers driving to a rental outlet by car. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Ananthanarayanan G., 2008, UC Berkeley
  2. Greenberg S., 2006, ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Building
  3. Nedevschi S., Usenix NSDI'09
  4. Nedevschi S., Usenix NSDI'08
  5. Sivaraman D., 2007, Industrial Ecology, 77
  6. Weber C. L., 2009, White Paper
  7. Williams E., 2008, Industrial Ecology, 99

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Seetharam, A., Somasundaram, M., Towsley, D., Kurose, J., & Shenoy, P.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the first ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Green networking
Publisher
ACM
Published
2010-08-30
Pages
61-68
OpenAlex
W2127549856
Cited by
27
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.05
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Green Networking (GreenNet) (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (0916972, 0855128, 0916577)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Green IT and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Energy Efficiency in Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Keywords
film streaming, carbon footprint, energy consumption, green computing, content distribution, energy efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review