The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using the past to score the present: extending term weighting models through revision history analysis
Abstract
The generative process underlies many information retrieval models, notably statistical language models. Yet these models only examine one (current) version of the document, effectively ignoring the actual document generation process. We posit that a considerable amount of information is encoded in the document authoring process, and this information is complementary to the word occurrence statistics upon which most modern retrieval models are based. We propose a new term weighting model, Revision History Analysis (RHA), which uses the revision history of a document (e.g., the edit history of a page in Wikipedia) to redefine term frequency - a key indicator of document topic/relevance for many retrieval models and text processing tasks. We then apply RHA to document ranking by extending two state-of-the-art text retrieval models, namely, BM25 and the generative statistical language model (LM). To the best of our knowledge, our paper is the first attempt to directly incorporate document authoring history into retrieval models. Empirical results show that RHA provides consistent improvements for state-of-the-art retrieval models, using standard retrieval tasks and benchmarks.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“[ Aji et al. 2010] introduced a new term weighting model that uses the revision history analysis (RHA) of a document to redefine a term's importance”
From Survey of Temporal Information Retrieval and Related Applications (2015) · cites this paper as Aji et al. 2010
Citations
Cites
Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques
Järvelin, K., & Kekäläinen, J. (2002) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/582415.582418 · Cited by 4,841
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- 10.1145/1148170.1148177 · DOI
- J. Allan . Introduction to topic detection and tracking . In Topic detection and tracking: event-based information organization , pages 1 -- 16 . Kluwer Academic Publishers , 2002 . J. Allan. Introduction to topic detection and tracking. In Topic detection and tracking: event-based information organization, pages 1--16. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002. · DOI
- 10.1145/1390334.1390419 · DOI
- 10.1145/1367497.1367561 · DOI
- 10.1145/1367497.1367505 · DOI
- 10.1145/1008992.1009000 · DOI
- 10.1145/1076034.1076086 · DOI
- 10.5555/1855138.1855147 · DOI
- 10.1145/1390334.1390394 · DOI
- 10.1145/1718487.1718489 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/125187.125189 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-540-85902-4_1 · DOI
- 10.1145/988672.988738 · DOI
- 10.1145/988672.988739 · DOI
- D. Hawking , N. Craswell , and P. Thistlewaite . Overview of TREC-7 very large collection track . In TREC-7 , 1998 . D. Hawking, N. Craswell, and P. Thistlewaite. Overview of TREC-7 very large collection track. In TREC-7, 1998.
- 10.1145/1645953.1646008 · DOI
- J. Kamps , S. Geva , and A. Trotman . Analysis of the inex 2009 ad hoc track results . In INEX , 2009 . J. Kamps, S. Geva, and A. Trotman. Analysis of the inex 2009 ad hoc track results. In INEX, 2009.
- 10.1145/775152.775233 · DOI
- 10.1145/1008992.1009027 · DOI
- 10.1145/383952.383970 · DOI
- 10.1145/1571941.1572023 · DOI
- 10.1145/1008992.1009026 · DOI
- 10.1145/860435.860463 · DOI
- 10.1145/1367497.1367557 · DOI
- S. Robertson , S. Walker , S. Jones , M. M. Hancock-Beaulieu , and M. Gatford . Okapi at TREC-3 . In Proc. 3rd TREC , pages 109 -- 126 , 1994 . S. Robertson, S. Walker, S. Jones, M. M. Hancock-Beaulieu, and M. Gatford. Okapi at TREC-3. In Proc. 3rd TREC, pages 109--126, 1994.
- 10.1145/1031171.1031181 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00778-007-0072-z · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ipm.2003.10.003 · DOI
- 10.1145/1390334.1390407 · DOI
- 10.1145/1148170.1148204 · DOI
- 10.1145/1242572.1242628 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Survey of Temporal Information Retrieval and Related Applications
Campos, R., Dias, G., Jorge, A. M., & Jatowt, A. (2015) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2619088 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Aji, A., Wang, Y., Agichtein, E., & Gabrilovich, E.
- Affiliations
- Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Yahoo! Research, Santa Clara, CA, USA
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2010-10-26
- Pages
- 629-638
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 1
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review